Usage Score
35.9
Player Dossier
2008-2011Iowa
WR • 6'4" • St. Louis, MO, USA
Marvin McNutt reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
35.9
Efficiency
90.9
Consistency
75.9
Season Value
75.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2011 Postseason · Iowa
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Marvin McNutt, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2011 Postseason · Iowa. Marvin McNutt reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Marvin McNutt played WR for Iowa. Across 4 tracked seasons, Marvin McNutt recorded 10 passing yards, 63 rushing yards, and 2,861 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2011 with Iowa.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Postseason
Iowa paired 1,315 primary output with 90.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 90.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2011 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Indiana
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
101.2
Efficiency
90.9
Usage
35.9
Consistency
75.9
Best Game by takeover score
Indiana
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma: 46. Tennessee Tech: 140. Iowa State: 61. Pittsburgh: 112. UL Monroe: 100. Penn State: 73. Northwestern: 87. Indiana: 184. Minnesota: 101. Michigan: 101. Michigan State: 130. Purdue: 151. Nebraska: 29
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma: 4 by 76.7. Tennessee Tech: 6 by 100. Iowa State: 4 by 100. Pittsburgh: 8 by 93.3. UL Monroe: 7 by 95.2. Penn State: 4 by 100. Northwestern: 6 by 96.7. Indiana: 6 by 100. Minnesota: 7 by 96.2. Michigan: 9 by 74.8. Michigan State: 8 by 100. Purdue: 9 by 100. Nebraska: 4 by 48.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Indiana
Best efficiency game
100 vs Purdue
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/31 | @ Oklahoma | L 14-31 | — | 4 | 46 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 16 |
| Fri 11/25 | @ Nebraska | L 7-20 | — | 4 | 29 | 5.8 | 7.30 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Purdue100 receiving yards · High volume | W 31-21 | — | 9 | 151 | 15.6 | 16.80 | 2 | 51 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Michigan State100 receiving yards · High volume | L 21-37 | — | 8 | 130 | 15.7 | 16.30 | 1 | 48 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Michigan100 receiving yards · High volume | W 24-16 | — | 9 | 101 | 10.8 | 11.20 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Minnesota100 receiving yards | L 21-22 | — | 7 | 101 | 15 | 14.40 | 1 | 27 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Indiana100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 45-24 | — | 6 | 184 | 30.7 | 30.70 | 3 | 80 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Northwestern | W 41-31 | — | 6 | 87 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 1 | 35 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Penn State | L 3-13 | — | 4 | 73 | 18.3 | 18.30 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs UL Monroe100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 45-17 | — | 7 | 100 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 2 | 22 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Pittsburgh100 receiving yards · High volume | W 31-27 | — | 8 | 112 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 43 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Iowa State | L 41-44 | — | 4 | 61 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Tennessee Tech100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 34-7 | — | 6 | 140 | 23.3 | 23.30 | 2 | 88 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Iowa
2008-2011
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Iowa | 11 | 73.3 | 7.7 | — |
| 2009 Postseason | Iowa | 674 | 85.7 | 18.4 | 663 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Iowa | 674 | 85.7 | 18.4 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | Iowa | 861 | 87.2 | 23.1 | 187 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Iowa | 861 | 87.2 | 23.1 | 0 |
| 2011 Postseason | Iowa | 1,315 | 90.9 | 35.9 | 454 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Iowa | 1,315 | 90.9 | 35.9 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Indiana
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
184
Primary metric
184 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Indiana
155
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
155 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Indiana
126
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
126 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Purdue
151
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
151 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Tennessee Tech
140
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
140 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2011 Postseason · Iowa
1,315 primary output · 90.9 efficiency · 35.9 usage
75.7
#2
2011 Regular Season · Iowa
75.7
1,315 primary · 90.9 efficiency · 35.9 usage
#3
2010 Postseason · Iowa
62.8
861 primary · 87.2 efficiency · 23.1 usage
11
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
6
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2020 · Rating 0.79
Lourdes · Oshkosh, WI
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,861
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 39 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.