Usage Score
36.7
Player Dossier
2007-2010Oklahoma State
RB • 5'8" • Tyler, TX, USA
Kendall Hunter leans workhorse runner traits and 55.7 efficiency.
Usage Score
36.7
Efficiency
55.7
Consistency
74.2
Season Value
65.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2008 Postseason · Oklahoma State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kendall Hunter, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2008 Postseason · Oklahoma State. Kendall Hunter leans workhorse runner traits and 55.7 efficiency.
Kendall Hunter played RB for Oklahoma State. Across 4 tracked seasons, Kendall Hunter recorded 4,181 rushing yards, 519 receiving yards, and 39 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2008 with Oklahoma State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason
Oklahoma State paired 1,753 primary output with 67.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 55.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Washington State
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
126.8
Efficiency
55.7
Usage
36.7
Consistency
74.2
Best Game by takeover score
Washington State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arizona: 27. Washington State: 253. Troy: 172. Tulsa: 88. Texas A&M: 102. Louisiana: 126. Texas Tech: 133. Nebraska: 201. Kansas State: 143. Baylor: 75. Texas: 153. Kansas: 117. Oklahoma: 59
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arizona: 11 by 30.2. Washington State: 24 by 93.9. Troy: 33 by 56.8. Tulsa: 14 by 59.7. Texas A&M: 23 by 47.2. Louisiana: 28 by 46.9. Texas Tech: 27 by 53. Nebraska: 26 by 80.5. Kansas State: 28 by 53.2. Baylor: 16 by 49. Texas: 24 by 58.1. Kansas: 23 by 51. Oklahoma: 14 by 44
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Washington State
Best efficiency game
93.9 vs Washington State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/30 | @ Arizona | W 36-10 | 10 | 32 | 3.20 | 0 | 1 | -5 | 2.5 |
| Sun 11/28 | vs Oklahoma | L 41-47 | 13 | 55 | 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4.2 |
| Sat 11/20 | @ Kansas100 rush yards | W 48-14 | 22 | 105 | 4.80 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 5.1 |
| Sun 11/14 | @ Texas100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 33-16 | 23 | 116 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 37 | 6.4 |
| Sat 11/6 | vs Baylor2+ TD | W 55-28 | 14 | 66 | 4.70 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 4.7 |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Kansas State100 rush yards | W 24-14 | 28 | 143 | 5.10 | 0 | — | — | 5.1 |
| Sat 10/23 | vs Nebraska100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | L 41-51 | 26 | 201 | 7.70 | 2 | — | — | 7.7 |
| Sat 10/16 | @ Texas Tech100 rush yards | W 34-17 | 25 | 130 | 5.20 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4.9 |
| Sat 10/9 | @ Louisiana100 rush yards | W 54-28 | 28 | 126 | 4.50 | 1 | — | — | 4.5 |
| Thu 9/30 | vs Texas A&M100 rush yards · 2+ TD | W 38-35 | 22 | 101 | 4.60 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4.4 |
| Sat 9/18 | vs Tulsa | W 65-28 | 11 | 59 | 5.40 | 0 | 3 | 29 | 6.3 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Troy100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 41-38 | 28 | 157 | 5.60 | 2 | 5 | 15 | 5.2 |
| Sat 9/4 | vs Washington State100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 65-17 | 21 | 257 | 12.20 | 4 | 3 | -4 | 10.5 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Oklahoma State
2007-2010
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 833 | 60.9 | 15.5 | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 833 | 60.9 | 15.5 | 0 |
| 2008 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 1,753 | 67.5 | 33.6 | 920 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 1,753 | 67.5 | 33.6 | 0 |
| 2009 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 465 | 42.4 | 22.9 | -1,288 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 465 | 42.4 | 22.9 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 1,649 | 55.7 | 36.7 | 1,184 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 1,649 | 55.7 | 36.7 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Washington State
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
253
Primary metric
253 scrimmage yards and 34.3 usage.
#2
Houston
228
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
228 scrimmage yards and 35.9 usage.
#3
Ole Miss
100
Primary metric
Loss with 100 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
100 scrimmage yards and 26.8 usage.
#4
Troy
138
Primary metric
Loss with 138 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
138 scrimmage yards and 34.5 usage.
#5
Texas
192
Primary metric
Loss with 192 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
192 scrimmage yards and 35.2 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2008 Postseason · Oklahoma State
1,753 primary output · 67.5 efficiency · 33.6 usage
68.8
#2
2008 Regular Season · Oklahoma State
68.8
1,753 primary · 67.5 efficiency · 33.6 usage
#3
2010 Postseason · Oklahoma State
65.2
1,649 primary · 55.7 efficiency · 36.7 usage
20
100+ rush yards
8
150+ scrimmage yards
13
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
4,700
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 46 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.