Usage Score
19.8
Player Profile
Chazz Anderson
QB • 6'1" • Pickerington, OH, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Chazz Anderson is a balanced quarterback profile with 19.8 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
58.7
Consistency
67.9
Season Value
61.5
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · Buffalo
08091011
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Primary stop by seasons
- Cincinnati
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · Buffalo
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Syracuse
Chazz Anderson, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season · Buffalo. Chazz Anderson is a balanced quarterback profile with 19.8 usage in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2011 Regular Season
Buffalo paired 2,763 primary output with 58.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2011 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 58.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2011 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Cincinnati, Buffalo.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Northern Illinois
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2011 Regular Season · Buffalo
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
230.3
Efficiency
58.7
Usage
19.8
Consistency
67.9
Best Game by takeover score
Bowling Green
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Pittsburgh: 292. Unknown: 178. Ball State: 208. UConn: 228. Tennessee: 178. Ohio: 341. Temple: 89. Northern Illinois: 460. Miami (OH): 293. Eastern Michigan: 118. Akron: 182. Bowling Green: 196
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Pittsburgh: 57 by 56. Unknown: 25 by 64.7. Ball State: 33 by 67.4. UConn: 46 by 56.8. Tennessee: 26 by 71.4. Ohio: 40 by 58.1. Temple: 29 by 40.7. Northern Illinois: 63 by 67.6. Miami (OH): 50 by 52.4. Eastern Michigan: 42 by 49.5. Akron: 30 by 70.4. Bowling Green: 50 by 49.9
Split Comparison
Wins261.5 · n=2 · +32.4 vs Losses
Losses229.1 · n=9 · -32.4 vs Wins
First Half237.5 · n=6 · +14.5 vs Second Half
Second Half223 · n=6 · -14.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Northern Illinois
Best efficiency game
71.4 vs Tennessee
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/25 | vs Bowling Green | L 28-42 | 16 | 39 | 157 | 41.0 | 0 | 1 | 49.9 | 11 | 39 | 3.50 | 1 | 11 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Akron3+ TD | W 51-10 | 19 | 25 | 155 | 76.0 | 2 | 0 | 70.4 | 5 | 27 | 5.40 | 1 | 10 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Eastern Michigan | L 17-30 | 18 | 31 | 149 | 58.1 | 0 | 0 | 49.5 | 11 | -31 | -2.80 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Miami (OH) | L 13-41 | 24 | 41 | 281 | 58.5 | 1 | 2 | 52.4 | 9 | 12 | 1.30 | 1 | 12 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Northern Illinois300-yard game · 3+ TD | L 30-31 | 35 | 53 | 404 | 66.0 | 3 | 2 | 67.6 | 10 | 56 | 5.60 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Temple | L 0-34 | 9 | 26 | 84 | 34.6 | 0 | 1 | 40.7 | 3 | 5 | 1.70 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Ohio300-yard game | W 38-37 | 23 | 39 | 343 | 59.0 | 2 | 0 | 58.1 | 1 | -2 | -2 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ TennesseeDual-threat | L 10-41 | 8 | 19 | 99 | 42.1 | 0 | 0 | 71.4 | 7 | 79 | 11.30 | 1 | 68 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs UConn | L 3-17 | 18 | 39 | 193 | 46.2 | 0 | 1 | 56.8 | 7 | 35 | 5 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Ball StateDual-threat | L 25-28 | 13 | 23 | 149 | 56.5 | 1 | 0 | 67.4 | 10 | 59 | 5.90 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown | — | 15 | 22 | 164 | 68.2 | 2 | 1 | 64.7 | 3 | 14 | 4.70 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/3 | @ Pittsburgh | L 16-35 | 32 | 49 | 276 | 65.3 | 0 | 1 | 56 | 8 | 16 | 2 | 1 | 13 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Cincinnati
2008-2010
Opening stop
- 2
Buffalo
2011
Final stop
Season Progression
2008200920102011
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 482 | 49.5 | 28 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 60 | 57.3 | 7.5 | -422 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 286 | 52.9 | 20.5 | 226 |
| 2011 Regular Season | Buffalo | 2,763 | 58.7 | 19.8 | 2,477 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Syracuse
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
214
Primary metric
214 total offense with 57.6 efficiency.
#2
Northern Illinois
460
Primary metric
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
460 total offense with 67.6 efficiency.
#3
Rutgers
227
Primary metric
Win with 227 yards of offense and 60.3 efficiency.
227 total offense with 60.3 efficiency.
#4
Unknown
24
Primary metric
Game with 24 yards of offense and 71.7 efficiency.
24 total offense with 71.7 efficiency.
#5
Louisville
23
Primary metric
Win with 23 yards of offense and 56.8 efficiency.
23 total offense with 56.8 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2011 Regular Season · Buffalo
2,763 primary output · 58.7 efficiency · 19.8 usage
61.5
#2
2008 Regular Season · Cincinnati
42.1
482 primary · 49.5 efficiency · 28 usage
#3
2009 Regular Season · Cincinnati
36.9
60 primary · 57.3 efficiency · 7.5 usage
Milestones
4
250+ passing yards
2
300+ total offense
0
3+ takeover TD games
7
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2007 · Rating 0.83
Pickerington Central · Pickerington, OH
- Committed To
- Cincinnati
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2007
Career Facts
2
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
3,591
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 21 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.