Usage Score
8.4
Player Dossier
2009-2012BYU
David Foote
RB • 5'11" • St. George, UT, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
David Foote leans balanced backfield option traits and 54.1 efficiency.
Efficiency
54.1
Consistency
78.3
Season Value
60.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2012 Postseason · BYU
091010111212
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- BYU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: New Mexico State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
David Foote, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2012 Postseason · BYU. David Foote leans balanced backfield option traits and 54.1 efficiency.
David Foote played RB for BYU. Across 4 tracked seasons, David Foote recorded 397 rushing yards, 158 receiving yards, and 2 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2012 with BYU.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2012 Postseason
BYU paired 320 primary output with 54.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2012 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 54.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2012 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: New Mexico State
Win with 58 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2012 Postseason · BYU
Games
10
Scrimmage Yards / G
32
Efficiency
54.1
Usage
8.4
Consistency
78.3
Best Game by takeover score
New Mexico State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. San Diego State: 25. Washington State: 26. Weber State: 32. Hawai'i: 39. Utah State: 26. Oregon State: 32. Georgia Tech: 0. Idaho: 46. San José State: 36. New Mexico State: 58
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. San Diego State: 5 by 37.5. Washington State: 4 by 67.7. Weber State: 7 by 39. Hawai'i: 10 by 40.6. Utah State: 5 by 42. Oregon State: 4 by 52.1. Idaho: 11 by 41.2. San José State: 3 by 68.8. New Mexico State: 5 by 98.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins31.5 · Games = 8 · -2.5 vs Losses
Losses34 · Games = 2 · +2.5 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
New Mexico State
Best efficiency game
98.3 vs New Mexico State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/21 | @ San Diego State | W 23-6 | 3 | 8 | 2.70 | 0 | 2 | 17 | 5 |
| Sat 11/24 | @ New Mexico State | W 50-14 | 4 | 52 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 11.6 |
| Sun 11/18 | @ San José State | L 14-20 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 33 | 12 |
| Sun 11/11 | vs Idaho | W 52-13 | 10 | 38 | 3.80 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 4.2 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Georgia Tech | W 41-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Oregon State | L 24-42 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 29 | 8 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Utah State | W 6-3 | 4 | 13 | 3.30 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 5.2 |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Hawai'i | W 47-0 | 10 | 39 | 3.90 | 0 | — | — | 3.9 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Weber State | W 45-13 | 5 | 16 | 3.20 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 4.6 |
| Fri 8/31 | vs Washington State | W 30-6 | 4 | 26 | 6.50 | 0 | — | — | 6.5 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
BYU
2009-2012
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
200920102010201120122012
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | BYU | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2010 Postseason | BYU | 89 | 65.4 | 3.8 | 89 |
| 2010 Regular Season | BYU | 89 | 65.4 | 3.8 | 0 |
| 2011 Regular Season | BYU | 146 | 73.1 | 4.3 | 57 |
| 2012 Postseason | BYU | 320 | 54.1 | 8.4 | 174 |
| 2012 Regular Season | BYU | 320 | 54.1 | 8.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
New Mexico State
Win with 58 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
58
Primary metric
58 scrimmage yards and 7.5 usage.
#2
Colorado State
32
Primary metric
Win with 32 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
32 scrimmage yards and 3.5 usage.
#3
Hawai'i
61
Primary metric
Win with 61 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
61 scrimmage yards and 3.3 usage.
#4
UCF
21
Primary metric
Win with 21 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
21 scrimmage yards and 2.1 usage.
#5
Idaho
46
Primary metric
Win with 46 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
46 scrimmage yards and 15.7 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2012 Postseason · BYU
320 primary output · 54.1 efficiency · 8.4 usage
60.2
#2
2012 Regular Season · BYU
60.2
320 primary · 54.1 efficiency · 8.4 usage
#3
2011 Regular Season · BYU
47
146 primary · 73.1 efficiency · 4.3 usage
Milestones
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
555
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 19 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring David Foote
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.