Usage Score
25.5
Player Dossier
2008-2009Northwestern
WR • 5'11" • Capron, IL, USA
Zeke Markshausen reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
25.5
Efficiency
70.1
Consistency
75.6
Season Value
67.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2009 Postseason · Northwestern
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Zeke Markshausen, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2009 Postseason · Northwestern. Zeke Markshausen reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Zeke Markshausen played WR for Northwestern. Across 2 tracked seasons, Zeke Markshausen recorded 38 passing yards, 9 rushing yards, and 864 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2009 with Northwestern.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
Northwestern paired 858 primary output with 70.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 70.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Illinois
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
66
Efficiency
70.1
Usage
25.5
Consistency
75.6
Best Game by takeover score
Illinois
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Auburn: 84. Towson: 30. Eastern Michigan: 38. Syracuse: 86. Minnesota: 70. Purdue: 56. Miami (OH): 68. Michigan State: 111. Indiana: 94. Penn State: 60. Iowa: 20. Illinois: 104. Wisconsin: 37
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Auburn: 12 by 46.7. Towson: 2 by 100. Eastern Michigan: 2 by 100. Syracuse: 9 by 63.7. Minnesota: 6 by 77.8. Purdue: 10 by 37.3. Miami (OH): 5 by 90.7. Michigan State: 16 by 46.3. Indiana: 8 by 78.3. Penn State: 9 by 44.4. Iowa: 3 by 44.4. Illinois: 6 by 100. Wisconsin: 3 by 82.2
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Illinois
Best efficiency game
100 vs Illinois
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 1/1 | @ AuburnHigh volume | L 35-38 | — | 12 | 84 | 6.5 | 7 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 11/21 | vs Wisconsin | W 33-31 | — | 3 | 37 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 11/14 | @ Illinois100 receiving yards | W 21-16 | — | 6 | 104 | 17.3 | 17.30 | 1 | 28 |
| Sat 11/7 | @ Iowa | W 17-10 | — | 3 | 20 | 6.7 | 6.70 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs Penn StateHigh volume | L 13-34 | — | 9 | 60 | 6.2 | 6.70 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/24 | vs IndianaHigh volume | W 29-28 | — | 8 | 94 | 10.4 | 11.80 | 1 | 28 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ Michigan State100 receiving yards · High volume | L 14-24 | — | 16 | 111 | 6.9 | 6.90 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Miami (OH) | W 16-6 | — | 5 | 68 | 13.6 | 13.60 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ PurdueHigh volume | W 27-21 | — | 10 | 56 | 5.6 | 5.60 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs Minnesota | L 24-35 | — | 6 | 70 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 9/19 | @ SyracuseHigh volume | L 34-37 | — | 9 | 86 | 9.6 | 9.60 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 27-24 | — | 2 | 38 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Towson | W 47-14 | — | 2 | 30 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 20 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Northwestern
2008-2009
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Northwestern | 6 | 40 | 4.3 | — |
| 2009 Postseason | Northwestern | 858 | 70.1 | 25.5 | 852 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Northwestern | 858 | 70.1 | 25.5 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Illinois
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
104
Primary metric
104 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Indiana
94
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
94 receiving yards with a 78.3 efficiency score.
#3
Michigan State
111
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
111 receiving yards with a 46.3 efficiency score.
#4
Miami (OH)
68
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
68 receiving yards with a 90.7 efficiency score.
#5
Syracuse
86
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
86 receiving yards with a 63.7 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2009 Postseason · Northwestern
858 primary output · 70.1 efficiency · 25.5 usage
67.8
#2
2009 Regular Season · Northwestern
67.8
858 primary · 70.1 efficiency · 25.5 usage
#3
2008 Regular Season · Northwestern
36.2
6 primary · 40 efficiency · 4.3 usage
2
100+ receiving yards
6
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
864
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 14 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.