Player Stats

Steven Threet College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Total offense
3,859
Passing yards
3,639
Rushing yards
220
Touchdowns
31

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTotal OffensePass YdsRush YdsTDOverall
2008 Regular SeasonMichigan101,3061,1052011155.9
2009 Regular SeasonArizona State00000-
2010 Regular SeasonArizona State112,5532,534192065.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season

Arizona State paired 2,553 primary output with 53.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2010 Regular Season role shape

pass-led usage with 53.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2010 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Michigan, Arizona State.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Oregon

Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2010 Regular Season · Arizona State

Games

11

Primary Metric / G

232.1

Efficiency

53.4

Usage

15.6

Consistency

72.3

Best Game by takeover score

Oregon

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Portland State: 263. Northern Arizona: 382. Wisconsin: 213. Oregon: 393. Oregon State: 183. Washington: 288. California: 125. Washington State: 307. USC: 233. Stanford: 163. UCLA: 3

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Portland State: 24 by 80.6. Northern Arizona: 51 by 54.4. Wisconsin: 38 by 55.2. Oregon: 63 by 48.3. Oregon State: 42 by 41.3. Washington: 43 by 55.1. California: 19 by 41.3. Washington State: 34 by 73.6. USC: 47 by 48.7. Stanford: 30 by 52.3. UCLA: 4 by 36.1

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins248.6 · Games = 5 · +30.3 vs Losses
Losses218.3 · Games = 6 · -30.3 vs Wins