Usage Score
15.6
Player Dossier
2008-2010Arizona State
QB • 6'5" • Adrian, MI, USA
Steven Threet is a balanced quarterback profile with 15.6 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
15.6
Efficiency
53.4
Consistency
72.3
Season Value
60.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2010 Regular Season · Arizona State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Steven Threet, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2010 Regular Season · Arizona State. Steven Threet is a balanced quarterback profile with 15.6 usage in the latest tracked season.
Steven Threet played QB for Michigan and Arizona State. Across 3 tracked seasons, Steven Threet recorded 3,639 passing yards, 220 rushing yards, and 31 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2010 with Arizona State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season
Arizona State paired 2,553 primary output with 53.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 53.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2010 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Michigan, Arizona State.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Oregon
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Primary Metric / G
232.1
Efficiency
53.4
Usage
15.6
Consistency
72.3
Best Game by takeover score
Oregon
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Portland State: 263. Northern Arizona: 382. Wisconsin: 213. Oregon: 393. Oregon State: 183. Washington: 288. California: 125. Washington State: 307. USC: 233. Stanford: 163. UCLA: 3
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Portland State: 24 by 80.6. Northern Arizona: 51 by 54.4. Wisconsin: 38 by 55.2. Oregon: 63 by 48.3. Oregon State: 42 by 41.3. Washington: 43 by 55.1. California: 19 by 41.3. Washington State: 34 by 73.6. USC: 47 by 48.7. Stanford: 30 by 52.3. UCLA: 4 by 36.1
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Oregon
Best efficiency game
80.6 vs Portland State
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/26 | vs UCLA | W 55-34 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 33.3 | 0 | 0 | 36.1 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 0 |
| Sun 11/14 | vs Stanford | L 13-17 | 16 | 26 | 158 | 61.5 | 1 | 1 | 52.3 | 4 | 5 | 1.30 | 1 | 4 |
| Sun 11/7 | @ USC3+ TD | L 33-34 | 24 | 40 | 228 | 60.0 | 3 | 2 | 48.7 | 7 | 5 | 0.70 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/30 | vs Washington State300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 42-0 | 26 | 32 | 300 | 81.3 | 3 | 0 | 73.6 | 2 | 7 | 3.50 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/23 | @ California | L 17-50 | 8 | 16 | 125 | 50.0 | 0 | 2 | 41.3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| Sun 10/10 | @ Washington3+ TD | W 24-14 | 21 | 34 | 288 | 61.8 | 2 | 1 | 55.1 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 |
| Sat 10/2 | @ Oregon State | L 28-31 | 14 | 29 | 203 | 48.3 | 1 | 3 | 41.3 | 13 | -20 | -1.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sun 9/26 | vs Oregon300-yard game · 3+ TD | L 31-42 | 30 | 53 | 387 | 56.6 | 3 | 4 | 48.3 | 10 | 6 | 0.60 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 9/18 | @ Wisconsin | L 19-20 | 21 | 33 | 211 | 63.6 | 0 | 0 | 55.2 | 5 | 2 | 0.40 | 0 | 7 |
| Sun 9/12 | vs Northern Arizona300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 41-20 | 33 | 49 | 391 | 67.3 | 3 | 2 | 54.4 | 2 | -9 | -4.50 | 0 | 2 |
| Sun 9/5 | vs Portland State | W 54-9 | 14 | 21 | 239 | 66.7 | 2 | 1 | 80.6 | 3 | 24 | 8 | 0 | 10 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Michigan
2008
Opening stop
Arizona State
2009-2010
Final stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Michigan | 1,306 | 53.4 | 21.6 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Arizona State | 0 | — | — | -1,306 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Arizona State | 2,553 | 53.4 | 15.6 | 2,553 |
#1 Featured game
Illinois
Loss with 226 yards of offense and 52.7 efficiency.
226
Primary metric
226 total offense with 52.7 efficiency.
#2
Michigan State
187
Primary metric
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
187 total offense with 42.3 efficiency.
#3
Oregon
393
Primary metric
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
393 total offense with 48.3 efficiency.
#4
Wisconsin
185
Primary metric
Win shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
185 total offense with 59.4 efficiency.
#5
Northern Arizona
382
Primary metric
Win shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
382 total offense with 54.4 efficiency.
#1 Season by Season Value
2010 Regular Season · Arizona State
2,553 primary output · 53.4 efficiency · 15.6 usage
60.3
#2
2008 Regular Season · Michigan
49.3
1,306 primary · 53.4 efficiency · 21.6 usage
#3
2009 Regular Season · Arizona State
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
5
250+ passing yards
3
300+ total offense
5
3+ TD games
5
Above avg efficiency
Career Facts
2
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
3,859
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 21 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.