Usage Score
4.6
Player Dossier
2008-2009Tulsa
QB • 6'3" • Meridian, ID, USA
Jacob Bower is a balanced quarterback profile with 4.6 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
4.6
Efficiency
63.8
Consistency
31.9
Season Value
50.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2008 Postseason · Tulsa
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jacob Bower, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2008 Postseason · Tulsa. Jacob Bower is a balanced quarterback profile with 4.6 usage in the latest tracked season.
Jacob Bower played QB for Tulsa. Across 2 tracked seasons, Jacob Bower recorded 427 passing yards, 150 rushing yards, and 5 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2009 with Tulsa.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason
Tulsa paired 244 primary output with 76.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 63.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: SMU
Loss with 213 yards of offense and 72.2 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
5
Primary Metric / G
66.6
Efficiency
63.8
Usage
4.6
Consistency
31.9
Best Game by takeover score
SMU
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. New Mexico: 37. Oklahoma: 61. Sam Houston: 22. SMU: 213. Memphis: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. New Mexico: 3 by 86.3. Oklahoma: 13 by 56.5. Sam Houston: 3 by 70.8. SMU: 23 by 72.2. Memphis: 1 by 33.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
5 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
SMU
Best efficiency game
86.3 vs New Mexico
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Tulsa
2008-2009
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Postseason | Tulsa | 244 | 76.1 | 4.4 | — |
| 2008 Regular Season | Tulsa | 244 | 76.1 | 4.4 | 0 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Tulsa | 333 | 63.8 | 4.6 | 89 |
#1 Featured game
Arkansas
Loss with 22 yards of offense and 100 efficiency.
22
Primary metric
22 total offense with 100 efficiency.
#2
Central Arkansas
61
Primary metric
Win with 61 yards of offense and 72.9 efficiency.
61 total offense with 72.9 efficiency.
#3
SMU
213
Primary metric
Loss with 213 yards of offense and 72.2 efficiency.
213 total offense with 72.2 efficiency.
#4
UTEP
42
Primary metric
Win with 42 yards of offense and 90 efficiency.
42 total offense with 90 efficiency.
#5
Houston
50
Primary metric
Loss with 50 yards of offense and 48.5 efficiency.
50 total offense with 48.5 efficiency.
#1 Season by Season Value
2008 Postseason · Tulsa
244 primary output · 76.1 efficiency · 4.4 usage
50.6
#2
2008 Regular Season · Tulsa
50.6
244 primary · 76.1 efficiency · 4.4 usage
#3
2009 Regular Season · Tulsa
50.1
333 primary · 63.8 efficiency · 4.6 usage
0
250+ passing yards
0
300+ total offense
0
3+ TD games
12
Above avg efficiency
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
577
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 16 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.