Usage Score
21.4
Player Dossier
2007-2010UAB
WR • 6'2" • Mobile, AL, USA
Frantrell Forrest reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
21.4
Efficiency
83.5
Consistency
74.8
Season Value
69.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2010 Regular Season · UAB
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Frantrell Forrest, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2010 Regular Season · UAB. Frantrell Forrest reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Frantrell Forrest played WR for UAB. Across 4 tracked seasons, Frantrell Forrest recorded 157 rushing yards, 2,215 receiving yards, and 20 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2009 with UAB.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season
UAB paired 558 primary output with 83.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 83.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tennessee
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
62
Efficiency
83.5
Usage
21.4
Consistency
74.8
Best Game by takeover score
Tennessee
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Florida Atlantic: 10. SMU: 71. Troy: 71. Tennessee: 109. UCF: 4. UTEP: 99. Mississippi State: 58. Southern Miss: 67. Marshall: 69
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida Atlantic: 1 by 66.7. SMU: 5 by 94.7. Troy: 4 by 100. Tennessee: 7 by 100. UCF: 1 by 26.7. UTEP: 7 by 94.3. Mississippi State: 5 by 77.3. Southern Miss: 4 by 100. Marshall: 5 by 92
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tennessee
Best efficiency game
100 vs Southern Miss
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/6 | vs Marshall | L 17-31 | — | 5 | 69 | 11.3 | 13.80 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Southern Miss | W 50-49 | — | 4 | 67 | 11.1 | 16.80 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 10/23 | @ Mississippi State | L 24-29 | — | 5 | 58 | 11.6 | 11.60 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 10/16 | vs UTEP2+ TD | W 21-6 | — | 7 | 99 | 14.1 | 14.10 | 2 | 28 |
| Thu 10/7 | @ UCF | L 7-42 | — | 1 | 4 | 5.5 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 9/25 | @ Tennessee100 receiving yards | L 29-32 | — | 7 | 109 | 14.4 | 15.60 | 1 | 42 |
| Sat 9/18 | vs Troy | W 34-33 | — | 4 | 71 | 17.8 | 17.80 | 1 | 33 |
| Sun 9/12 | @ SMU | L 7-28 | — | 5 | 71 | 14.2 | 14.20 | 0 | 51 |
| Fri 9/3 | vs Florida Atlantic | L 31-32 | — | 1 | 10 | 2.7 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UAB
2007-2010
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Regular Season | UAB | 563 | 64.7 | 23.5 | — |
| 2008 Regular Season | UAB | 536 | 86.6 | 23.8 | -27 |
| 2009 Regular Season | UAB | 558 | 81.6 | 21.2 | 22 |
| 2010 Regular Season | UAB | 558 | 83.5 | 21.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Mississippi State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
122
Primary metric
122 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Memphis
129
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
129 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Florida Atlantic
149
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
149 receiving yards with a 90.3 efficiency score.
#4
Tennessee
109
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
109 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Houston
96
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
96 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2010 Regular Season · UAB
558 primary output · 83.5 efficiency · 21.4 usage
69.7
#2
2009 Regular Season · UAB
66.3
558 primary · 81.6 efficiency · 21.2 usage
#3
2008 Regular Season · UAB
62.8
536 primary · 86.6 efficiency · 23.8 usage
4
100+ receiving yards
3
8+ catch outings
5
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
2,215
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 42 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.