Usage Score
32.8
Player Dossier
2008-2009Illinois
QB • 6'2" • Chicago, IL, USA
Juice Williams is a dual-threat creator with 32.8 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
32.8
Efficiency
64.3
Consistency
67.2
Season Value
54.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2008 Regular Season · Illinois
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Juice Williams, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2008 Regular Season · Illinois. Juice Williams is a dual-threat creator with 32.8 usage in the latest tracked season.
Juice Williams played QB for Illinois. Across 2 tracked seasons, Juice Williams recorded 4,805 passing yards, 1,226 rushing yards, and -1 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2008 with Illinois.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season
Illinois paired 3,892 primary output with 62.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 64.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2009 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Penn State
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 90.9th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Primary Metric / G
194.5
Efficiency
64.3
Usage
32.8
Consistency
67.2
Best Game by takeover score
Penn State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Missouri: 206. Illinois State: 49. Ohio State: 95. Penn State: 321. Michigan State: 142. Indiana: 312. Purdue: 115. Michigan: 220. Minnesota: 63. Cincinnati: 349. Fresno State: 267
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Missouri: 41 by 56. Illinois State: 1 by 100. Ohio State: 40 by 39.4. Penn State: 56 by 58.6. Michigan State: 29 by 55.5. Indiana: 52 by 63.4. Purdue: 32 by 47.6. Michigan: 32 by 78. Minnesota: 12 by 75.7. Cincinnati: 45 by 72.9. Fresno State: 30 by 60
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Penn State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Illinois State
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/5 | vs Fresno State3+ TD · Dual-threat | L 52-53 | 8 | 16 | 211 | 50.0 | 3 | 2 | 60 | 14 | 56 | 4 | 0 | 11 |
| Fri 11/27 | @ Cincinnati3+ TD · Dual-threat | L 36-49 | 21 | 34 | 282 | 61.8 | 3 | 0 | 72.9 | 11 | 67 | 6.10 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 11/7 | @ Minnesota | W 35-32 | 5 | 5 | 53 | 100.0 | 1 | 0 | 75.7 | 7 | 10 | 1.40 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs MichiganDual-threat | W 38-13 | 8 | 11 | 123 | 72.7 | 1 | 0 | 78 | 21 | 97 | 4.60 | 1 | 28 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Purdue | L 14-24 | 9 | 18 | 77 | 50.0 | 0 | 1 | 47.6 | 14 | 38 | 2.70 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ IndianaDual-threat | L 14-27 | 22 | 37 | 258 | 59.5 | 2 | 0 | 63.4 | 15 | 54 | 3.60 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Michigan State | L 14-24 | 7 | 17 | 109 | 41.2 | 1 | 0 | 55.5 | 12 | 33 | 2.80 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/3 | vs Penn StateDual-threat | L 17-35 | 20 | 36 | 263 | 55.6 | 1 | 1 | 58.6 | 20 | 58 | 2.90 | 1 | 14 |
| Sat 9/26 | @ Ohio State | L 0-30 | 13 | 25 | 77 | 52.0 | 0 | 2 | 39.4 | 15 | 18 | 1.20 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs Illinois State | W 45-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 100 | 1 | 49 | 49 | 0 | 49 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Missouri | L 9-37 | 18 | 28 | 179 | 64.3 | 0 | 1 | 56 | 13 | 27 | 2.10 | 0 | 9 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Illinois
2008-2009
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Illinois | 3,892 | 62.5 | 39.1 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Illinois | 2,139 | 64.3 | 32.8 | -1,753 |
#1 Featured game
Minnesota
Loss with 503 yards of offense and 67.6 efficiency.
503
Primary metric
503 total offense with 67.6 efficiency.
#2
Penn State
321
Primary metric
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
321 total offense with 58.6 efficiency.
#3
Missouri
461
Primary metric
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
461 total offense with 59.4 efficiency.
#4
Michigan
431
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
431 total offense with 78.3 efficiency.
#5
Cincinnati
349
Primary metric
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
349 total offense with 72.9 efficiency.
#1 Season by Season Value
2008 Regular Season · Illinois
3,892 primary output · 62.5 efficiency · 39.1 usage
69.6
#2
2009 Regular Season · Illinois
54.8
2,139 primary · 64.3 efficiency · 32.8 usage
9
250+ passing yards
10
300+ total offense
6
3+ TD games
12
Above avg efficiency
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
6,031
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 23 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.