Usage Score
31.9
Player Dossier
2008-2010Purdue
WR • 6'2" • Fort Hood, TX, USA
Keith Smith reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
31.9
Efficiency
46.1
Consistency
73.3
Season Value
40.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2009 Regular Season · Purdue
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Keith Smith, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2009 Regular Season · Purdue. Keith Smith reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Keith Smith played WR for Purdue. Across 3 tracked seasons, Keith Smith recorded 15 passing yards, 10 rushing yards, and 1,709 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2009 with Purdue.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season
Purdue paired 1,100 primary output with 79 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 46.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2010 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Notre Dame
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
2
Receiving Yards / G
61.5
Efficiency
46.1
Usage
31.9
Consistency
73.3
Best Game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Notre Dame: 80. Western Illinois: 43
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
2 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Best efficiency game
47.8 vs Western Illinois
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Purdue
2008-2010
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Purdue | 486 | 61.4 | 16.9 | — |
| 2009 Regular Season | Purdue | 1,100 | 79 | 32.2 | 614 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Purdue | 123 | 46.1 | 31.9 | -977 |
#1 Featured game
Notre Dame
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
136
Primary metric
136 receiving yards with a 82.4 efficiency score.
#2
Toledo
117
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
117 receiving yards with a 97.5 efficiency score.
#3
Minnesota
126
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
126 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Michigan State
152
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
152 receiving yards with a 67.6 efficiency score.
#5
Indiana
136
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
136 receiving yards with a 75.6 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2009 Regular Season · Purdue
1,100 primary output · 79 efficiency · 32.2 usage
71.3
#2
2008 Regular Season · Purdue
41.1
486 primary · 61.4 efficiency · 16.9 usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · Purdue
40.6
123 primary · 46.1 efficiency · 31.9 usage
7
100+ receiving yards
7
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
1,709
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 26 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.