Player Stats

Jeremy Ross College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
764
Receptions
57
Touchdowns
7

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2008 PostseasonCalifornia1129055.2
2008 Regular SeasonCalifornia1115201355.2
2009 PostseasonCalifornia13229165.1
2009 Regular SeasonCalifornia1320315165.1
2010 Regular SeasonCalifornia1018210260.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason

California paired 344 primary output with 72.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2010 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 73.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Washington State

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2010 Regular Season · California

Games

10

Receiving Yards / G

21

Efficiency

73.5

Usage

14.9

Consistency

56.9

Best Game by takeover score

Washington State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. UC Davis: 18. Colorado: 27. Nevada: 12. Arizona: 17. UCLA: 0. USC: 33. Arizona State: 44. Oregon State: 0. Washington State: 45. Oregon: 14

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UC Davis: 2 by 60. Colorado: 1 by 100. Nevada: 3 by 26.7. Arizona: 2 by 56.7. USC: 2 by 100. Arizona State: 3 by 97.8. Washington State: 3 by 100. Oregon: 2 by 46.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins26.8 · Games = 5 · +11.6 vs Losses
Losses15.2 · Games = 5 · -11.6 vs Wins