Usage Score
14.9
Player Dossier
2008-2010California
Jeremy Ross
WR • 5'11" • Sacramento, CA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Jeremy Ross reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
73.5
Consistency
56.9
Season Value
50.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · California
0808090910
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- California
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Washington State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jeremy Ross, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · California. Jeremy Ross reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Jeremy Ross played WR for California. Across 3 tracked seasons, Jeremy Ross recorded 30 passing yards, 201 rushing yards, and 764 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2009 with California.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
California paired 344 primary output with 72.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 73.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2010 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Washington State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Regular Season · California
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
21
Efficiency
73.5
Usage
14.9
Consistency
56.9
Best Game by takeover score
Oregon
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 18. Colorado: 27. Nevada: 12. Arizona: 17. UCLA: 0. USC: 33. Arizona State: 44. Oregon State: 0. Washington State: 45. Oregon: 14
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 2 by 60. Colorado: 1 by 100. Nevada: 3 by 26.7. Arizona: 2 by 56.7. USC: 2 by 100. Arizona State: 3 by 97.8. Washington State: 3 by 100. Oregon: 2 by 46.7
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins29 · Games = 4 · +13.8 vs Losses
Losses15.2 · Games = 5 · -13.8 vs Wins
First Half14.8 · Games = 5 · -12.4 vs Second Half
Second Half27.2 · Games = 5 · +12.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Washington State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Washington State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/14 | vs Oregon | L 13-15 | — | 2 | 14 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 11/6 | @ Washington State | W 20-13 | — | 3 | 45 | 18 | 15 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Oregon State | L 7-35 | — | — | — | 6 | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/23 | vs Arizona State | W 50-17 | — | 3 | 44 | 15.8 | 14.70 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 10/16 | @ USC | L 14-48 | — | 2 | 33 | 16.5 | 16.50 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 10/9 | vs UCLA | W 35-7 | — | — | — | 9.5 | — | — | — |
| Sun 9/26 | @ Arizona | L 9-10 | — | 2 | 17 | 6 | 8.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/18 | @ Nevada | L 31-52 | — | 3 | 12 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Colorado | W 52-7 | — | 1 | 27 | 27 | 27 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 9/4 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 11 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
California
2008-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
20082008200920092010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Postseason | California | 210 | 71 | 15.5 | — |
| 2008 Regular Season | California | 210 | 71 | 15.5 | 0 |
| 2009 Postseason | California | 344 | 72.5 | 11.2 | 134 |
| 2009 Regular Season | California | 344 | 72.5 | 11.2 | 0 |
| 2010 Regular Season | California | 210 | 73.5 | 14.9 | -134 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Washington State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
45
Primary metric
45 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Minnesota
73
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
73 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Arizona
56
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
56 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Arizona State
44
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
44 receiving yards with a 97.8 efficiency score.
#5
UCLA
44
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
44 receiving yards with a 97.8 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2009 Postseason · California
344 primary output · 72.5 efficiency · 11.2 usage
57.2
#2
2009 Regular Season · California
57.2
344 primary · 72.5 efficiency · 11.2 usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · California
50.7
210 primary · 73.5 efficiency · 14.9 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2006 · Rating 0.8033
Laguna Creek · Elk Grove, CA
- Committed To
- California
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2006
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
764
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.