Usage Score
14
Player Dossier
2007-2010Minnesota
QB • 6'3" • Shoreview, MN, USA
Adam Weber is a balanced quarterback profile with 14 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
14
Efficiency
61.6
Consistency
79.3
Season Value
58.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2007 Regular Season · Minnesota
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Adam Weber, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2007 Regular Season · Minnesota. Adam Weber is a balanced quarterback profile with 14 usage in the latest tracked season.
Adam Weber played QB for Minnesota. Across 4 tracked seasons, Adam Weber recorded 10,917 passing yards, 873 rushing yards, and 9 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2007 with Minnesota.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2007 Regular Season
Minnesota paired 3,512 primary output with 58.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 61.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2010 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Northern Illinois
Loss with 373 yards of offense and 75.4 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
236.3
Efficiency
61.6
Usage
14
Consistency
79.3
Best Game by takeover score
Northern Illinois
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Middle Tennessee: 134. South Dakota: 305. USC: 226. Northern Illinois: 373. Northwestern: 211. Wisconsin: 263. Purdue: 256. Penn State: 304. Ohio State: 153. Michigan State: 161. Illinois: 262. Iowa: 187
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Middle Tennessee: 21 by 58.1. South Dakota: 37 by 78.9. USC: 33 by 48.4. Northern Illinois: 46 by 75.4. Northwestern: 26 by 67.6. Wisconsin: 32 by 61.8. Purdue: 52 by 56.6. Penn State: 52 by 53.1. Ohio State: 27 by 48.1. Michigan State: 24 by 53.3. Illinois: 42 by 67.3. Iowa: 28 by 70.8
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Northern Illinois
Best efficiency game
78.9 vs South Dakota
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/27 | vs Iowa | W 27-24 | 13 | 25 | 164 | 52.0 | 0 | 0 | 70.8 | 3 | 23 | 7.70 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 11/13 | @ Illinois | W 38-34 | 20 | 36 | 225 | 55.6 | 2 | 0 | 67.3 | 6 | 37 | 6.20 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 11/6 | @ Michigan State | L 8-31 | 15 | 22 | 167 | 68.2 | 1 | 1 | 53.3 | 2 | -6 | -3 | 0 | 2 |
| Sun 10/31 | vs Ohio State | L 10-52 | 9 | 20 | 162 | 45.0 | 0 | 1 | 48.1 | 7 | -9 | -1.30 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/23 | vs Penn State3+ TD | L 21-33 | 26 | 49 | 299 | 53.1 | 3 | 1 | 53.1 | 3 | 5 | 1.70 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/16 | @ Purdue | L 17-28 | 20 | 45 | 214 | 44.4 | 2 | 2 | 56.6 | 7 | 42 | 6 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 10/9 | @ Wisconsin3+ TD | L 23-41 | 11 | 25 | 249 | 44.0 | 3 | 0 | 61.8 | 7 | 14 | 2 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 10/2 | vs Northwestern | L 28-29 | 14 | 23 | 194 | 60.9 | 2 | 1 | 67.6 | 3 | 17 | 5.70 | 0 | 16 |
| Sun 9/26 | vs Northern Illinois300-yard game | L 23-34 | 31 | 46 | 373 | 67.4 | 2 | 1 | 75.4 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/18 | vs USC | L 21-32 | 15 | 29 | 224 | 51.7 | 2 | 2 | 48.4 | 4 | 2 | 0.50 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs South Dakota3+ TD | L 38-41 | 21 | 31 | 258 | 67.7 | 3 | 0 | 78.9 | 6 | 47 | 7.80 | 0 | 13 |
| Thu 9/2 | @ Middle Tennessee | W 24-17 | 10 | 17 | 150 | 58.8 | 0 | 0 | 58.1 | 4 | -16 | -4 | 0 | 3 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Minnesota
2007-2010
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Regular Season | Minnesota | 3,512 | 58.3 | 33.6 | — |
| 2008 Postseason | Minnesota | 2,994 | 58.1 | 31.4 | -518 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Minnesota | 2,994 | 58.1 | 31.4 | 0 |
| 2009 Postseason | Minnesota | 2,449 | 48.4 | 17.1 | -545 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Minnesota | 2,449 | 48.4 | 17.1 | 0 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Minnesota | 2,835 | 61.6 | 14 | 386 |
#1 Featured game
Northern Illinois
Loss with 373 yards of offense and 75.4 efficiency.
373
Primary metric
373 total offense with 75.4 efficiency.
#2
Northwestern
380
Primary metric
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
380 total offense with 59.9 efficiency.
#3
Wisconsin
439
Primary metric
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
439 total offense with 68.1 efficiency.
#4
Northwestern
430
Primary metric
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
430 total offense with 72 efficiency.
#5
Northern Illinois
328
Primary metric
Win with 328 yards of offense and 64.2 efficiency.
328 total offense with 64.2 efficiency.
#1 Season by Season Value
2007 Regular Season · Minnesota
3,512 primary output · 58.3 efficiency · 33.6 usage
68.4
#2
2008 Postseason · Minnesota
63.5
2,994 primary · 58.1 efficiency · 31.4 usage
#3
2008 Regular Season · Minnesota
63.5
2,994 primary · 58.1 efficiency · 31.4 usage
14
250+ passing yards
11
300+ total offense
10
3+ TD games
17
Above avg efficiency
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
11,790
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 50 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.