Usage Score
17.8
Player Dossier
2007-2009Middle Tennessee
Patrick Honeycutt
WR • 5'9" • Pelham, AL, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Patrick Honeycutt reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
70.3
Consistency
64.9
Season Value
58.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2009 Postseason · Middle Tennessee
07080909
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Middle Tennessee
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Florida Atlantic
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Patrick Honeycutt, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2009 Postseason · Middle Tennessee. Patrick Honeycutt reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Patrick Honeycutt played WR for Middle Tennessee. Across 3 tracked seasons, Patrick Honeycutt recorded 39 passing yards, 1,261 receiving yards, and 9 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2008 with Middle Tennessee.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
Middle Tennessee paired 420 primary output with 70.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 70.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Memphis
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Postseason · Middle Tennessee
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
35
Efficiency
70.3
Usage
17.8
Consistency
64.9
Best Game by takeover score
Memphis
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Southern Miss: 9. Clemson: 17. Memphis: 71. Maryland: 57. North Texas: 9. Troy: 66. Western Kentucky: 49. Florida Atlantic: 6. Florida International: 32. Louisiana: 42. Arkansas State: 17. UL Monroe: 45
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Southern Miss: 1 by 60. Clemson: 4 by 28.3. Memphis: 5 by 94.7. Maryland: 5 by 76. North Texas: 1 by 60. Troy: 5 by 88. Western Kentucky: 3 by 100. Florida Atlantic: 1 by 40. Florida International: 3 by 71.1. Louisiana: 3 by 93.3. Arkansas State: 2 by 56.7. UL Monroe: 4 by 75
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins33.7 · Games = 10 · -7.8 vs Losses
Losses41.5 · Games = 2 · +7.8 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Memphis
Best efficiency game
100 vs Western Kentucky
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/21 | vs Southern Miss | W 42-32 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/28 | @ UL Monroe | W 38-19 | — | 4 | 45 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 11/21 | vs Arkansas State | W 38-14 | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 11/14 | vs Louisiana | W 34-17 | — | 3 | 42 | 14 | 14 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 11/7 | vs Florida International | W 48-21 | — | 3 | 32 | 10.7 | 10.70 | 1 | 12 |
| Sat 10/31 | @ Florida Atlantic | W 27-20 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/24 | vs Western Kentucky | W 62-24 | — | 3 | 49 | 16.3 | 16.30 | 0 | 17 |
| Wed 10/7 | @ Troy | L 7-31 | — | 5 | 66 | 13.2 | 13.20 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/26 | @ North Texas | W 37-21 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/19 | @ Maryland | W 32-31 | — | 5 | 57 | 11.4 | 11.40 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs Memphis | W 31-14 | — | 5 | 71 | 14.2 | 14.20 | 1 | 24 |
| Sat 9/5 | @ Clemson | L 14-37 | — | 4 | 17 | 4.3 | 4.30 | 0 | 7 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Middle Tennessee
2007-2009
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
2007200820092009
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 328 | 63.5 | 16.9 | — |
| 2008 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 513 | 60.5 | 22.2 | 185 |
| 2009 Postseason | Middle Tennessee | 420 | 70.3 | 17.8 | -93 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Middle Tennessee | 420 | 70.3 | 17.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Florida Atlantic
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
113
Primary metric
113 receiving yards with a 83.7 efficiency score.
#2
Memphis
71
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
71 receiving yards with a 94.7 efficiency score.
#3
Louisville
87
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
87 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
North Texas
91
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
91 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
#5
Troy
66
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
66 receiving yards with a 88 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2009 Postseason · Middle Tennessee
420 primary output · 70.3 efficiency · 17.8 usage
58.7
#2
2009 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee
58.7
420 primary · 70.3 efficiency · 17.8 usage
#3
2008 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee
56.4
513 primary · 60.5 efficiency · 22.2 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
1,261
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring Patrick Honeycutt
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.