Usage Score
14.4
Player Dossier
2006-2010Bowling Green
WR • 6'0" • Maple Heights, OH, USA
Tyrone Pronty reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
14.4
Efficiency
84.1
Consistency
67.5
Season Value
65.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Bowling Green
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tyrone Pronty, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Bowling Green. Tyrone Pronty reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season
Bowling Green paired 512 primary output with 84.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 84.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2010 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Michigan
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
46.5
Efficiency
84.1
Usage
14.4
Consistency
67.5
Best Game by takeover score
Western Michigan
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Troy: 58. Tulsa: 41. Marshall: 69. Michigan: 92. Buffalo: 63. Ohio: 30. Kent State: 27. Central Michigan: 38. Miami (OH): 21. Toledo: 61. Western Michigan: 12
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Troy: 4 by 96.7. Tulsa: 5 by 54.7. Marshall: 3 by 100. Michigan: 3 by 100. Buffalo: 2 by 100. Ohio: 2 by 100. Kent State: 5 by 36. Central Michigan: 2 by 100. Miami (OH): 1 by 100. Toledo: 7 by 58.1. Western Michigan: 1 by 80
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Michigan
Best efficiency game
100 vs Miami (OH)
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/26 | vs Western Michigan | L 7-41 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Thu 11/18 | @ Toledo | L 14-33 | — | 7 | 61 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 0 | 16 |
| Thu 11/11 | vs Miami (OH) | L 21-24 | — | 1 | 21 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Central Michigan | W 17-14 | — | 2 | 38 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 10/23 | vs Kent State | L 6-30 | — | 5 | 27 | 5 | 5.40 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/9 | @ Ohio | L 25-49 | — | 2 | 30 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/2 | vs Buffalo | L 26-28 | — | 2 | 63 | 20.7 | 31.50 | 1 | 49 |
| Sat 9/25 | @ Michigan | L 21-65 | — | 3 | 92 | 30.7 | 30.70 | 1 | 71 |
| Sat 9/18 | vs Marshall | W 44-28 | — | 3 | 69 | 23 | 23 | 1 | 31 |
| Sat 9/11 | @ Tulsa | L 20-33 | — | 5 | 41 | 8.2 | 8.20 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 9/4 | @ Troy | L 27-30 | — | 4 | 58 | 14.6 | 14.50 | 0 | 18 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Bowling Green
2006-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 37 | 52.5 | 8.7 | — |
| 2007 Postseason | Bowling Green | 165 | 57.1 | 7.5 | 128 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 165 | 57.1 | 7.5 | 0 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 197 | 40.4 | 12.4 | 32 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 30 | 33.3 | 18.8 | -167 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 512 | 84.1 | 14.4 | 482 |
#1 Featured game
Michigan
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
92
Primary metric
92 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Boise State
74
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
74 receiving yards with a 82.2 efficiency score.
#3
Marshall
69
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
69 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Buffalo
63
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
63 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Temple
31
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
31 receiving yards with a 68.9 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2010 Regular Season · Bowling Green
512 primary output · 84.1 efficiency · 14.4 usage
65.5
#2
2007 Postseason · Bowling Green
39.6
165 primary · 57.1 efficiency · 7.5 usage
#3
2007 Regular Season · Bowling Green
39.6
165 primary · 57.1 efficiency · 7.5 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2006 · Rating 0.7222
Maple Heights · Maple Heights, OH
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
941
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 37 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Tyrone Pronty quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit