Usage Score
22.4
Player Dossier
2006-2009UTEP
WR • 6'0" • Irving, TX, USA
Jeff Moturi reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
22.4
Efficiency
80.1
Consistency
45.6
Season Value
62
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2007 Regular Season · UTEP
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jeff Moturi, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2007 Regular Season · UTEP. Jeff Moturi reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Jeff Moturi played WR for UTEP. Across 4 tracked seasons, Jeff Moturi recorded 97 rushing yards, 2,491 receiving yards, and 25 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2009 with UTEP.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2007 Regular Season
UTEP paired 855 primary output with 76.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 80.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2009 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Marshall
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
81.2
Efficiency
80.1
Usage
22.4
Consistency
45.6
Best Game by takeover score
Marshall
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Buffalo: 38. Kansas: 14. New Mexico State: 54. Texas: 9. Houston: 127. Memphis: 118. Tulsa: 37. UAB: 161. Tulane: 27. SMU: 153. Rice: 57. Marshall: 179
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Buffalo: 6 by 42.2. Kansas: 2 by 46.7. New Mexico State: 4 by 90. Texas: 1 by 60. Houston: 6 by 100. Memphis: 5 by 100. Tulsa: 4 by 61.7. UAB: 7 by 100. Tulane: 3 by 60. SMU: 5 by 100. Rice: 3 by 100. Marshall: 7 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Marshall
Best efficiency game
100 vs Marshall
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/28 | vs Marshall100 receiving yards | W 52-21 | — | 7 | 179 | 25.6 | 25.60 | 1 | 80 |
| Sat 11/21 | @ Rice | L 29-30 | — | 3 | 57 | 16.5 | 19 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 11/14 | @ SMU100 receiving yards | L 31-35 | — | 5 | 153 | 30.6 | 30.60 | 1 | 51 |
| Sat 11/7 | @ Tulane | L 38-45 | — | 3 | 27 | 11 | 9 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs UAB100 receiving yards | L 33-38 | — | 7 | 161 | 23 | 23 | 0 | 51 |
| Thu 10/22 | vs Tulsa | W 28-24 | — | 4 | 37 | 9 | 9.30 | 0 | 14 |
| Sun 10/11 | @ Memphis100 receiving yards | L 20-35 | — | 5 | 118 | 23.6 | 23.60 | 1 | 56 |
| Sun 10/4 | vs Houston100 receiving yards | W 58-41 | — | 6 | 127 | 18.4 | 21.20 | 1 | 74 |
| Sat 9/26 | @ Texas | L 7-64 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sun 9/20 | @ New Mexico State | W 38-12 | — | 4 | 54 | 10.8 | 13.50 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs Kansas | L 7-34 | — | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sun 9/6 | vs Buffalo | L 17-23 | — | 6 | 38 | 8.4 | 6.30 | 0 | 8 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UTEP
2006-2009
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | UTEP | 7 | 46.7 | 6.7 | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | UTEP | 855 | 76.2 | 28.7 | 848 |
| 2008 Regular Season | UTEP | 655 | 69.1 | 19.3 | -200 |
| 2009 Regular Season | UTEP | 974 | 80.1 | 22.4 | 319 |
#1 Featured game
Tulsa
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
174
Primary metric
174 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Rice
109
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
109 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Marshall
179
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
179 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
UAB
161
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
161 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
SMU
153
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
153 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2007 Regular Season · UTEP
855 primary output · 76.2 efficiency · 28.7 usage
63.3
#2
2009 Regular Season · UTEP
62
974 primary · 80.1 efficiency · 22.4 usage
#3
2008 Regular Season · UTEP
55.5
655 primary · 69.1 efficiency · 19.3 usage
10
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
5
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
2,491
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.