Player Dossier

2006-2009

Clemson

Jacoby Ford

WR • 5'10" • Royal Palm Beach, FL, USA

Alpha targetExplosive finisher

Jacoby Ford reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Usage Score

27

Efficiency

80.7

Consistency

70.8

Season Value

69.6

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by Season Value: 2009 Postseason · Clemson

06060708080909

Snapshot

Career Teams
1
Seasons Tracked
7
Program Path
Clemson
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Georgia Tech

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Jacoby Ford, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2009 Postseason · Clemson. Jacoby Ford reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Jacoby Ford played WR for Clemson. Across 4 tracked seasons, Jacoby Ford recorded 55 passing yards, 494 rushing yards, and 1,919 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2009 with Clemson.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason

Clemson paired 779 primary output with 80.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2009 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 80.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Georgia Tech

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2009 Postseason · Clemson

Games

14

Receiving Yards / G

55.6

Efficiency

80.7

Usage

27

Consistency

70.8

Best Game by takeover score

Georgia Tech

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011121314

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Kentucky: 44. Middle Tennessee: 70. Georgia Tech: 109. Boston College: 36. TCU: 55. Maryland: 37. Wake Forest: 51. Miami: 37. Coastal Carolina: 45. Florida State: 53. NC State: 55. Virginia: 106. South Carolina: 49. Georgia Tech: 32

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kentucky: 3 by 97.8. Middle Tennessee: 3 by 100. Georgia Tech: 5 by 100. Boston College: 6 by 40. TCU: 6 by 61.1. Maryland: 5 by 49.3. Wake Forest: 1 by 100. Miami: 2 by 100. Coastal Carolina: 4 by 75. Florida State: 5 by 70.7. NC State: 2 by 100. Virginia: 6 by 100. South Carolina: 5 by 65.3. Georgia Tech: 3 by 71.1

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins55.2 · Games = 9 · -1.2 vs Losses
Losses56.4 · Games = 5 · +1.2 vs Wins

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

14 games

Featured metric

Receiving Yards

Top game by takeover score

Georgia Tech

Best efficiency game

100 vs Virginia

Result
Mon 12/28vs KentuckyW 21-1334411.514.70132
Sun 12/6vs Georgia TechL 34-39332910.70015
Sat 11/28@ South CarolinaL 17-345496.99.80023
Sat 11/21vs Virginia100 receiving yardsW 34-21610617.417.70128
Sat 11/14@ NC StateW 43-232552427.50047
Sun 11/8vs Florida StateW 40-2455310.210.60023
Sat 10/31vs Coastal CarolinaW 49-34451111.30136
Sat 10/24@ MiamiW 40-3723713.318.50126
Sat 10/17vs Wake ForestW 38-315127.551051
Sat 10/3@ MarylandL 21-2453787.40017
Sat 9/26vs TCUL 10-146559.29.20023
Sat 9/19vs Boston CollegeW 25-76366.66029
Thu 9/10@ Georgia Tech100 receiving yardsL 27-30510915.721.80177
Sat 9/5vs Middle TennesseeW 37-1437019.823.30143

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Clemson

    2006-2009

    Opening stop

Season Value Progression

2006200620072008200820092009
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2006 PostseasonClemson12036.712.1
2006 Regular SeasonClemson12036.712.10
2007 Regular SeasonClemson31093.713.3190
2008 PostseasonClemson71073.322.1400
2008 Regular SeasonClemson71073.322.10
2009 PostseasonClemson77980.72769
2009 Regular SeasonClemson77980.7270

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Georgia Tech

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

109

Primary metric

109 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#2

Nebraska

112

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

112 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#3

Virginia

106

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

106 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#4

NC State

106

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

106 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#5

UL Monroe

68

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

68 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by Season Value

2009 Postseason · Clemson

779 primary output · 80.7 efficiency · 27 usage

69.6

#2

2009 Regular Season · Clemson

69.6

779 primary · 80.7 efficiency · 27 usage

#3

2008 Postseason · Clemson

63.4

710 primary · 73.3 efficiency · 22.1 usage

Milestones

4

100+ receiving yards

0

8+ catch outings

1

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit context is not available for this player in the current dataset.

Career Facts

1

Career teams

7

Seasons tracked

1,919

Career Receiving Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 45 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.