Usage Score
27
Player Dossier
2006-2009Clemson
WR • 5'10" • Royal Palm Beach, FL, USA
Jacoby Ford reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
27
Efficiency
80.7
Consistency
70.8
Season Value
69.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2009 Postseason · Clemson
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jacoby Ford, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2009 Postseason · Clemson. Jacoby Ford reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Jacoby Ford played WR for Clemson. Across 4 tracked seasons, Jacoby Ford recorded 55 passing yards, 494 rushing yards, and 1,919 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2009 with Clemson.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
Clemson paired 779 primary output with 80.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 80.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Georgia Tech
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
55.6
Efficiency
80.7
Usage
27
Consistency
70.8
Best Game by takeover score
Georgia Tech
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Kentucky: 44. Middle Tennessee: 70. Georgia Tech: 109. Boston College: 36. TCU: 55. Maryland: 37. Wake Forest: 51. Miami: 37. Coastal Carolina: 45. Florida State: 53. NC State: 55. Virginia: 106. South Carolina: 49. Georgia Tech: 32
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kentucky: 3 by 97.8. Middle Tennessee: 3 by 100. Georgia Tech: 5 by 100. Boston College: 6 by 40. TCU: 6 by 61.1. Maryland: 5 by 49.3. Wake Forest: 1 by 100. Miami: 2 by 100. Coastal Carolina: 4 by 75. Florida State: 5 by 70.7. NC State: 2 by 100. Virginia: 6 by 100. South Carolina: 5 by 65.3. Georgia Tech: 3 by 71.1
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Georgia Tech
Best efficiency game
100 vs Virginia
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/28 | vs Kentucky | W 21-13 | — | 3 | 44 | 11.5 | 14.70 | 1 | 32 |
| Sun 12/6 | vs Georgia Tech | L 34-39 | — | 3 | 32 | 9 | 10.70 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/28 | @ South Carolina | L 17-34 | — | 5 | 49 | 6.9 | 9.80 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 11/21 | vs Virginia100 receiving yards | W 34-21 | — | 6 | 106 | 17.4 | 17.70 | 1 | 28 |
| Sat 11/14 | @ NC State | W 43-23 | — | 2 | 55 | 24 | 27.50 | 0 | 47 |
| Sun 11/8 | vs Florida State | W 40-24 | — | 5 | 53 | 10.2 | 10.60 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs Coastal Carolina | W 49-3 | — | 4 | 45 | 11 | 11.30 | 1 | 36 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Miami | W 40-37 | — | 2 | 37 | 13.3 | 18.50 | 1 | 26 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs Wake Forest | W 38-3 | — | 1 | 51 | 27.5 | 51 | 0 | 51 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ Maryland | L 21-24 | — | 5 | 37 | 8 | 7.40 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs TCU | L 10-14 | — | 6 | 55 | 9.2 | 9.20 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Boston College | W 25-7 | — | 6 | 36 | 6.6 | 6 | 0 | 29 |
| Thu 9/10 | @ Georgia Tech100 receiving yards | L 27-30 | — | 5 | 109 | 15.7 | 21.80 | 1 | 77 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Middle Tennessee | W 37-14 | — | 3 | 70 | 19.8 | 23.30 | 1 | 43 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Clemson
2006-2009
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Postseason | Clemson | 120 | 36.7 | 12.1 | — |
| 2006 Regular Season | Clemson | 120 | 36.7 | 12.1 | 0 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Clemson | 310 | 93.7 | 13.3 | 190 |
| 2008 Postseason | Clemson | 710 | 73.3 | 22.1 | 400 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Clemson | 710 | 73.3 | 22.1 | 0 |
| 2009 Postseason | Clemson | 779 | 80.7 | 27 | 69 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Clemson | 779 | 80.7 | 27 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Georgia Tech
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
109
Primary metric
109 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Nebraska
112
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
112 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Virginia
106
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
106 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
NC State
106
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
106 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
UL Monroe
68
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
68 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2009 Postseason · Clemson
779 primary output · 80.7 efficiency · 27 usage
69.6
#2
2009 Regular Season · Clemson
69.6
779 primary · 80.7 efficiency · 27 usage
#3
2008 Postseason · Clemson
63.4
710 primary · 73.3 efficiency · 22.1 usage
4
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,919
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 45 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.