Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2006-2008Wisconsin
—
PJ Hill shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Usage Score
—
Efficiency
—
Consistency
51.3
Season Value
66.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2006 Regular Season · Wisconsin
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
PJ Hill, player. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2006 Regular Season · Wisconsin. PJ Hill shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
PJ Hill is listed for Wisconsin. Detailed college production data is limited on CFB Track.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2006 Regular Season
Wisconsin paired 16 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2008 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2008 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Indiana
Win with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Primary Metric / G
1
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
51.3
Best Game by takeover score
Indiana
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Florida State: 0. Akron: 2. Marshall: 2. Fresno State: 0. Michigan: 0. Ohio State: 1. Penn State: 0. Iowa: 0. Illinois: 0. Michigan State: 1. Indiana: 3. Minnesota: 2. Cal Poly: 2
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Indiana
Best efficiency game
— vs Florida State
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/27 | @ Florida State | L 13-42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 15 | 140 | 9.30 | 0 | 46 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Cal Poly | W 36-35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14 | 59 | 4.20 | 2 | 13 |
| Sat 11/15 | vs Minnesota | W 35-32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 24 | 117 | 4.90 | 2 | 38 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Indiana | W 55-20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 19 | 126 | 6.60 | 3 | 19 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Michigan State | L 24-25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20 | 106 | 5.30 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Illinois | W 27-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Iowa | L 16-38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 8 | 34 | 4.30 | 0 | 11 |
| Sun 10/12 | vs Penn State | L 7-48 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 15 | 58 | 3.90 | 0 | 15 |
| Sun 10/5 | vs Ohio State | L 17-20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 16 | 63 | 3.90 | 1 | 9 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Michigan | L 25-27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 22 | 70 | 3.20 | 0 | 10 |
| Sun 9/14 | @ Fresno State | W 13-10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 26 | 112 | 4.30 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Marshall | W 51-14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 18 | 57 | 3.20 | 2 | 10 |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Akron | W 38-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 26 | 210 | 8.10 | 2 | 46 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Wisconsin
2006-2008
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 16 | — | — | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 15 | — | — | -1 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 13 | — | — | -2 |
#1 Featured game
Indiana
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
3
Primary metric
3 primary-metric impact.
#2
Western Illinois
3
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
3 primary-metric impact.
#3
The Citadel
5
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
5 primary-metric impact.
#4
Indiana
3
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
3 primary-metric impact.
#5
Purdue
2
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#1 Season by Season Value
2006 Regular Season · Wisconsin
16 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
79.9
#2
2008 Regular Season · Wisconsin
66.3
13 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2007 Regular Season · Wisconsin
65.2
15 primary · — efficiency · — usage
10
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 37 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.