Usage Score
8.6
Player Dossier
2006-2009Texas Tech
Edward Britton
WR • El Paso, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Edward Britton reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
78.6
Consistency
65.9
Season Value
54.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2007 Postseason · Texas Tech
0606070708080909
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Texas Tech
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Texas
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Edward Britton, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2007 Postseason · Texas Tech. Edward Britton reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Edward Britton played WR for Texas Tech. Across 4 tracked seasons, Edward Britton recorded 72 rushing yards, 1,686 receiving yards, and 14 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2007 with Texas Tech.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2007 Postseason
Texas Tech paired 595 primary output with 75.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 78.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Oklahoma State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 90th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Postseason · Texas Tech
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
34.8
Efficiency
78.6
Usage
8.6
Consistency
65.9
Best Game by takeover score
Oklahoma State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Michigan State: 0. North Dakota: 42. Rice: 33. Texas: 69. New Mexico: 30. Kansas State: 44. Nebraska: 16. Texas A&M: 55. Oklahoma State: 63. Oklahoma: 9. Baylor: 22
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. North Dakota: 4 by 70. Rice: 4 by 55. Texas: 8 by 57.5. New Mexico: 2 by 100. Kansas State: 2 by 100. Nebraska: 1 by 100. Texas A&M: 3 by 100. Oklahoma State: 4 by 100. Oklahoma: 2 by 30. Baylor: 2 by 73.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins24.5 · Games = 8 · -37.8 vs Losses
Losses62.3 · Games = 3 · +37.8 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Oklahoma State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Oklahoma State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 1/3 | vs Michigan State | W 41-31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/28 | @ Baylor | W 20-13 | — | 2 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/21 | vs Oklahoma | W 41-13 | — | 2 | 9 | 4.5 | 4.50 | 0 | 5 |
| Sun 11/15 | @ Oklahoma State | L 17-24 | — | 4 | 63 | 15.8 | 15.80 | 1 | 24 |
| Sat 10/24 | vs Texas A&M | L 30-52 | — | 3 | 55 | 18.3 | 18.30 | 1 | 26 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ Nebraska | W 31-10 | — | 1 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Kansas State | W 66-14 | — | 2 | 44 | 22 | 22 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 10/3 | vs New Mexico | W 48-28 | — | 2 | 30 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 18 |
| Sun 9/20 | @ TexasHigh volume | L 24-34 | — | 8 | 69 | 8.6 | 8.60 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs Rice | W 55-10 | — | 4 | 33 | 8.3 | 8.30 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs North Dakota | W 38-13 | — | 4 | 42 | 8.2 | 10.50 | 0 | 18 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas Tech
2006-2009
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
20062006200720072008200820092009
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Postseason | Texas Tech | 131 | 82.2 | 4.7 | — |
| 2006 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 131 | 82.2 | 4.7 | 0 |
| 2007 Postseason | Texas Tech | 595 | 75.1 | 9.1 | 464 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 595 | 75.1 | 9.1 | 0 |
| 2008 Postseason | Texas Tech | 577 | 78.4 | 8.1 | -18 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 577 | 78.4 | 8.1 | 0 |
| 2009 Postseason | Texas Tech | 383 | 78.6 | 8.6 | -194 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Texas Tech | 383 | 78.6 | 8.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Texas
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
116
Primary metric
116 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Texas
139
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
139 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Baylor
39
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
39 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Oklahoma State
63
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
63 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Texas A&M
55
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
55 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2007 Postseason · Texas Tech
595 primary output · 75.1 efficiency · 9.1 usage
60.4
#2
2007 Regular Season · Texas Tech
60.4
595 primary · 75.1 efficiency · 9.1 usage
#3
2009 Postseason · Texas Tech
54.4
383 primary · 78.6 efficiency · 8.6 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
1,686
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 43 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring Edward Britton
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.