Usage Score
11.8
Player Dossier
2006-2009Texas A&M
Jamie McCoy
TE • 6'3" • Midland, TX, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Jamie McCoy reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
64.6
Consistency
64.6
Season Value
53.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2006 Regular Season · Texas A&M
0607080909
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Texas A&M
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Iowa State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jamie McCoy, TE. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2006 Regular Season · Texas A&M. Jamie McCoy reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Jamie McCoy played TE for Texas A&M. Across 4 tracked seasons, Jamie McCoy recorded 148 rushing yards, 867 receiving yards, and 8 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2008 with Texas A&M.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2006 Regular Season
Texas A&M paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 64.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Utah State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Postseason · Texas A&M
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
30.6
Efficiency
64.6
Usage
11.8
Consistency
64.6
Best Game by takeover score
Utah State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Georgia: 39. New Mexico: 44. Utah State: 66. UAB: 59. Arkansas: 40. Oklahoma State: 15. Kansas State: 27. Texas Tech: 39. Iowa State: 8. Colorado: 8. Baylor: 2. Texas: 20
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia: 4 by 65. New Mexico: 5 by 58.7. Utah State: 3 by 100. UAB: 5 by 78.7. Arkansas: 5 by 53.3. Oklahoma State: 1 by 100. Kansas State: 2 by 90. Texas Tech: 4 by 65. Iowa State: 1 by 53.3. Colorado: 1 by 53.3. Baylor: 1 by 13.3. Texas: 3 by 44.4
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins36.3 · Games = 6 · +11.5 vs Losses
Losses24.8 · Games = 6 · -11.5 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Utah State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Oklahoma State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/28 | @ Georgia | L 20-44 | — | 4 | 39 | 9.8 | 9.80 | 1 | 15 |
| Fri 11/27 | vs Texas | L 39-49 | — | 3 | 20 | 4.8 | 6.70 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/21 | vs Baylor | W 38-3 | — | 1 | 2 | 1.5 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Sat 11/7 | @ Colorado | L 34-35 | — | 1 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs Iowa State | W 35-10 | — | 1 | 8 | 15 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Texas Tech | W 52-30 | — | 4 | 39 | 9.8 | 9.80 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ Kansas State | L 14-62 | — | 2 | 27 | 9.7 | 13.50 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Oklahoma State | L 31-36 | — | 1 | 15 | 7.8 | 15 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ Arkansas | L 19-47 | — | 5 | 40 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs UAB | W 56-19 | — | 5 | 59 | 11.8 | 11.80 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Utah State | W 38-30 | — | 3 | 66 | 22 | 22 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs New Mexico | W 41-6 | — | 5 | 44 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 0 | 21 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas A&M
2006-2009
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
20062007200820092009
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 500 | 74.9 | 17.5 | 500 |
| 2009 Postseason | Texas A&M | 367 | 64.6 | 11.8 | -133 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 367 | 64.6 | 11.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Iowa State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
110
Primary metric
110 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Utah State
66
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
66 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
UAB
59
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
59 receiving yards with a 78.7 efficiency score.
#4
Army
60
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
60 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#5
Baylor
57
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
57 receiving yards with a 95 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2006 Regular Season · Texas A&M
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2008 Regular Season · Texas A&M
64
500 primary · 74.9 efficiency · 17.5 usage
#3
2009 Postseason · Texas A&M
53.6
367 primary · 64.6 efficiency · 11.8 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
867
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 26 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring Jamie McCoy
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.