Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2005-2008Texas A&M
—
Jorvorskie Lane shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Usage Score
—
Efficiency
—
Consistency
14.8
Season Value
20.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2006 Regular Season · Texas A&M
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jorvorskie Lane, player. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2006 Regular Season · Texas A&M. Jorvorskie Lane shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Jorvorskie Lane is listed for Texas A&M. Detailed college production data is limited on CFB Track.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2006 Regular Season
Texas A&M paired 19 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2008 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2008 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Baylor
Loss with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
9
Primary Metric / G
0.6
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
14.8
Best Game by takeover score
Baylor
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. New Mexico: 0. Army: 0. Oklahoma State: 0. Kansas State: 1. Iowa State: 1. Colorado: 0. Oklahoma: 1. Baylor: 2. Texas: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Baylor
Best efficiency game
— vs Texas
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/28 | @ Texas | L 9-49 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 11/15 | @ Baylor | L 21-41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 0.70 | 2 | 1 |
| Sat 11/8 | vs Oklahoma | L 28-66 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Sat 11/1 | vs Colorado | W 24-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 7 | 3.50 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ Iowa State | W 49-35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Kansas State | L 30-44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 0.70 | 1 | 1 |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Oklahoma State | L 28-56 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Army | W 21-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7 | 38 | 5.40 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/6 | @ New Mexico | W 28-22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7 | 19 | 2.70 | 0 | 5 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Texas A&M
2005-2008
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 10 | — | — | — |
| 2006 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 19 | — | — | 9 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 17 | — | — | -2 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 5 | — | — | -12 |
#1 Featured game
Oklahoma State
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
3
Primary metric
3 primary-metric impact.
#2
Louisiana
4
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
4 primary-metric impact.
#3
Nebraska
4
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
4 primary-metric impact.
#4
Fresno State
4
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
4 primary-metric impact.
#5
Baylor
2
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#1 Season by Season Value
2006 Regular Season · Texas A&M
19 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
72.2
#2
2007 Regular Season · Texas A&M
62.6
17 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2005 Regular Season · Texas A&M
56.4
10 primary · — efficiency · — usage
8
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 45 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.