Usage Score
28.5
Player Dossier
2008-2009Colorado State
Rashaun Greer
WR • 6'1" • North Las Vegas, NV, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Rashaun Greer reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
88.7
Consistency
49.2
Season Value
58.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2008 Postseason · Colorado State
080809
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- Colorado State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Weber State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Rashaun Greer, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2008 Postseason · Colorado State. Rashaun Greer reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Rashaun Greer played WR for Colorado State. Across 2 tracked seasons, Rashaun Greer recorded 61 rushing yards, 1,853 receiving yards, and 3 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2008 with Colorado State.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason
Colorado State paired 1,114 primary output with 88.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 88.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2009 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Weber State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Regular Season · Colorado State
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
61.6
Efficiency
88.7
Usage
28.5
Consistency
49.2
Best Game by takeover score
Weber State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Colorado: 50. Weber State: 162. Nevada: 47. BYU: 19. Idaho: 125. Utah: 33. TCU: 15. San Diego State: 93. Air Force: 36. UNLV: 77. New Mexico: 36. Wyoming: 46
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Colorado: 2 by 100. Weber State: 6 by 100. Nevada: 3 by 100. BYU: 1 by 100. Idaho: 7 by 100. Utah: 3 by 73.3. TCU: 1 by 100. San Diego State: 6 by 100. Air Force: 2 by 100. UNLV: 7 by 73.3. New Mexico: 3 by 80. Wyoming: 8 by 38.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins86.3 · Games = 3 · +33.0 vs Losses
Losses53.3 · Games = 9 · -33.0 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Weber State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Air Force
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/27 | vs WyomingHigh volume | L 16-17 | — | 8 | 46 | 5.8 | 5.80 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/21 | @ New Mexico | L 27-29 | — | 3 | 36 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 15 |
| Sun 11/8 | @ UNLV | L 16-35 | — | 7 | 77 | 10.6 | 11 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs Air Force | L 16-34 | — | 2 | 36 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 10/24 | vs San Diego State | L 28-42 | — | 6 | 93 | 15.5 | 15.50 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ TCU | L 6-44 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Utah | L 17-24 | — | 3 | 33 | 19.5 | 11 | 0 | 21 |
| Sun 10/4 | @ Idaho100 receiving yards | L 29-31 | — | 7 | 125 | 17.9 | 17.90 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 9/26 | @ BYU | L 23-42 | — | 1 | 19 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Nevada | W 35-20 | — | 3 | 47 | 15.7 | 15.70 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs Weber State100 receiving yards | W 24-23 | — | 6 | 162 | 27 | 27 | 0 | 57 |
| Sun 9/6 | @ Colorado | W 23-17 | — | 2 | 50 | 17.7 | 25 | 0 | 45 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Colorado State
2008-2009
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
200820082009
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Postseason | Colorado State | 1,114 | 88.5 | 27 | — |
| 2008 Regular Season | Colorado State | 1,114 | 88.5 | 27 | 0 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Colorado State | 739 | 88.7 | 28.5 | -375 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Weber State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
162
Primary metric
162 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
UNLV
211
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
211 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Sacramento State
152
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
152 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Idaho
125
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
125 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Air Force
145
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
145 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2008 Postseason · Colorado State
1,114 primary output · 88.5 efficiency · 27 usage
67.7
#2
2008 Regular Season · Colorado State
67.7
1,114 primary · 88.5 efficiency · 27 usage
#3
2009 Regular Season · Colorado State
58.2
739 primary · 88.7 efficiency · 28.5 usage
Milestones
5
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
1,853
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 24 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring Rashaun Greer
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.