Usage Score
28.9
Player Dossier
2007-2009Michigan State
WR • 6'2" • Saginaw, MI, USA
Blair White reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
28.9
Efficiency
77
Consistency
58.9
Season Value
66.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2009 Postseason · Michigan State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Blair White, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2009 Postseason · Michigan State. Blair White reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Blair White played WR for Michigan State. Across 3 tracked seasons, Blair White recorded -2 rushing yards, 1,674 receiving yards, and 10 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2009 with Michigan State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
Michigan State paired 990 primary output with 77 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 77 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Northwestern
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
76.2
Efficiency
77
Usage
28.9
Consistency
58.9
Best Game by takeover score
Northwestern
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas Tech: 114. Montana State: 162. Central Michigan: 105. Notre Dame: 75. Wisconsin: 8. Michigan: 49. Illinois: 50. Northwestern: 186. Iowa: 95. Minnesota: 36. Western Michigan: 70. Purdue: 18. Penn State: 22
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas Tech: 6 by 100. Montana State: 9 by 100. Central Michigan: 7 by 100. Notre Dame: 6 by 83.3. Wisconsin: 1 by 53.3. Michigan: 6 by 54.4. Illinois: 4 by 83.3. Northwestern: 12 by 100. Iowa: 3 by 100. Minnesota: 4 by 60. Western Michigan: 6 by 77.8. Purdue: 3 by 40. Penn State: 3 by 48.9
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Northwestern
Best efficiency game
100 vs Texas Tech
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 1/3 | @ Texas Tech100 receiving yards | L 31-41 | — | 6 | 114 | 19 | 19 | 1 | 49 |
| Sat 11/21 | vs Penn State | L 14-42 | — | 3 | 22 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/14 | @ Purdue | W 40-37 | — | 3 | 18 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 9 |
| Sat 11/7 | vs Western Michigan | W 49-14 | — | 6 | 70 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 0 | 21 |
| Sun 11/1 | @ Minnesota | L 34-42 | — | 4 | 36 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/24 | vs Iowa | L 13-15 | — | 3 | 95 | 31.7 | 31.70 | 1 | 30 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs Northwestern100 receiving yards · High volume | W 24-14 | — | 12 | 186 | 15.5 | 15.50 | 2 | 47 |
| Sat 10/10 | @ Illinois | W 24-14 | — | 4 | 50 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 10/3 | vs Michigan | W 26-20 | — | 6 | 49 | 8.2 | 8.20 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/26 | @ Wisconsin | L 30-38 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/19 | @ Notre Dame2+ TD | L 30-33 | — | 6 | 75 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 2 | 30 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs Central Michigan100 receiving yards | L 27-29 | — | 7 | 105 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 39 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Montana State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 44-3 | — | 9 | 162 | 18 | 18 | 2 | 30 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Michigan State
2007-2009
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Regular Season | Michigan State | 25 | 55.6 | 13.6 | — |
| 2008 Postseason | Michigan State | 659 | 76.8 | 20 | 634 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Michigan State | 659 | 76.8 | 20 | 0 |
| 2009 Postseason | Michigan State | 990 | 77 | 28.9 | 331 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Michigan State | 990 | 77 | 28.9 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Northwestern
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
186
Primary metric
186 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Wisconsin
164
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
164 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Montana State
162
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
162 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Michigan
143
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
143 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Central Michigan
105
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
105 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2009 Postseason · Michigan State
990 primary output · 77 efficiency · 28.9 usage
66.2
#2
2009 Regular Season · Michigan State
66.2
990 primary · 77 efficiency · 28.9 usage
#3
2008 Postseason · Michigan State
50.8
659 primary · 76.8 efficiency · 20 usage
6
100+ receiving yards
3
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,674
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 26 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.