Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2005-2006Michigan State
—
Kerry Reed shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Usage Score
—
Efficiency
—
Consistency
11.1
Season Value
55.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2006 Regular Season · Michigan State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kerry Reed, player. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2006 Regular Season · Michigan State. Kerry Reed shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Kerry Reed is listed for Michigan State. Detailed college production data is limited on CFB Track.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2006 Regular Season
Michigan State paired 5 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2006 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2006 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Notre Dame
Loss with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
0.4
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
11.1
Best Game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Idaho: 1. Eastern Michigan: 0. Pittsburgh: 1. Notre Dame: 2. Illinois: 0. Michigan: 0. Ohio State: 0. Northwestern: 0. Indiana: 0. Purdue: 0. Minnesota: 0. Penn State: 1
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Best efficiency game
— vs Penn State
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/18 | @ Penn State | L 13-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/11 | vs Minnesota | L 18-31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | vs Purdue | L 15-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | @ Indiana | L 21-46 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | @ Northwestern | W 41-38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | vs Ohio State | L 7-38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/7 | @ Michigan | L 13-31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Illinois | L 20-23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 9/24 | vs Notre Dame | L 37-40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Pittsburgh | W 38-23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 52-20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Idaho | W 27-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Michigan State
2005-2006
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 Regular Season | Michigan State | 4 | — | — | — |
| 2006 Regular Season | Michigan State | 5 | — | — | 1 |
#1 Featured game
Penn State
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1
Primary metric
1 primary-metric impact.
#2
Northwestern
1
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#3
Michigan
1
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#4
Illinois
1
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#5
Notre Dame
2
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#1 Season by Season Value
2006 Regular Season · Michigan State
5 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
55.6
#2
2005 Regular Season · Michigan State
46.7
4 primary · — efficiency · — usage
5
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 22 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.