Usage Score
24.1
Player Dossier
2006-2009Arizona State
Chris McGaha
WR • 6'1" • Phoenix, AZ, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Chris McGaha reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
72.1
Consistency
51.3
Season Value
57.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2007 Postseason · Arizona State
060607070809
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Arizona State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UCLA
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Chris McGaha, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2007 Postseason · Arizona State. Chris McGaha reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Chris McGaha played WR for Arizona State. Across 4 tracked seasons, Chris McGaha recorded 1 rushing yards, 2,259 receiving yards, and 9 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2007 with Arizona State.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2007 Postseason
Arizona State paired 830 primary output with 89.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 72.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Oregon State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Regular Season · Arizona State
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
57.5
Efficiency
72.1
Usage
24.1
Consistency
51.3
Best Game by takeover score
Oregon State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Idaho State: 44. UL Monroe: 48. Georgia: 11. Oregon State: 165. Washington State: 21. Washington: 50. Stanford: 80. California: 76. USC: 118. Oregon: 45. UCLA: 9. Arizona: 23
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Idaho State: 2 by 100. UL Monroe: 6 by 53.3. Georgia: 2 by 36.7. Oregon State: 15 by 73.3. Washington State: 4 by 35. Washington: 1 by 100. Stanford: 6 by 88.9. California: 4 by 100. USC: 9 by 87.4. Oregon: 5 by 60. UCLA: 2 by 30. Arizona: 1 by 100
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins40.8 · Games = 4 · -25.1 vs Losses
Losses65.9 · Games = 8 · +25.1 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Oregon State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Arizona
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/28 | vs Arizona | L 17-20 | — | 1 | 23 | 23 | 23 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 11/21 | @ UCLA | L 13-23 | — | 2 | 9 | 4.5 | 4.50 | 0 | 5 |
| Sun 11/15 | @ Oregon | L 21-44 | — | 5 | 45 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 18 |
| Sun 11/8 | vs USC100 receiving yards · High volume | L 9-14 | — | 9 | 118 | 13.1 | 13.10 | 1 | 23 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs California | L 21-23 | — | 4 | 76 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 25 |
| Sun 10/25 | @ Stanford | L 14-33 | — | 6 | 80 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 1 | 18 |
| Sun 10/18 | vs Washington | W 24-17 | — | 1 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 1 | 50 |
| Sat 10/10 | @ Washington State | W 27-14 | — | 4 | 21 | 5.3 | 5.30 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/3 | vs Oregon State100 receiving yards · High volume | L 17-28 | — | 15 | 165 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 9/26 | @ Georgia | L 17-20 | — | 2 | 11 | 5.5 | 5.50 | 0 | 6 |
| Sun 9/20 | vs UL Monroe | W 38-14 | — | 6 | 48 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 17 |
| Sun 9/6 | vs Idaho State | W 50-3 | — | 2 | 44 | 22 | 22 | 0 | 39 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Arizona State
2006-2009
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
200620062007200720082009
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Postseason | Arizona State | 238 | 75.8 | 10.8 | — |
| 2006 Regular Season | Arizona State | 238 | 75.8 | 10.8 | 0 |
| 2007 Postseason | Arizona State | 830 | 89.9 | 23.7 | 592 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Arizona State | 830 | 89.9 | 23.7 | 0 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Arizona State | 501 | 84.1 | 15.7 | -329 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Arizona State | 690 | 72.1 | 24.1 | 189 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UCLA
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
123
Primary metric
123 receiving yards with a 91.1 efficiency score.
#2
Oregon State
165
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
165 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
#3
Oregon State
76
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
76 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Nevada
44
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
44 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
USC
118
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
118 receiving yards with a 87.4 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2007 Postseason · Arizona State
830 primary output · 89.9 efficiency · 23.7 usage
71.7
#2
2007 Regular Season · Arizona State
71.7
830 primary · 89.9 efficiency · 23.7 usage
#3
2009 Regular Season · Arizona State
57.6
690 primary · 72.1 efficiency · 24.1 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,259
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 46 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring Chris McGaha
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.