Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2006-2009Wisconsin
DB • 6'0" • Racine, WI, USA
Chris Maragos shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 20 disruption score.
Usage Score
—
Efficiency
20
Consistency
68.1
Season Value
62.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2009 Regular Season · Wisconsin
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Chris Maragos, DB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2009 Regular Season · Wisconsin. Chris Maragos shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 20 disruption score.
Chris Maragos played DB for Western Michigan and Wisconsin. Across 3 tracked seasons, Chris Maragos recorded 9 rushing yards, 222 receiving yards, and 1 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2006 with Western Michigan.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season
Wisconsin paired 4 primary output with 20 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 20 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2009 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Western Michigan, Wisconsin.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Michigan State
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
4
Havoc Plays / G
1
Efficiency
20
Usage
—
Consistency
68.1
Best Game by takeover score
Michigan State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Fresno State: 1. Michigan State: 2. Ohio State: 0. Indiana: 1
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
4 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Michigan State
Best efficiency game
40 vs Michigan State
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Western Michigan
2006
Opening stop
Wisconsin
2008-2009
Final stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Postseason | Western Michigan | 0 | 0 | — | — |
| 2006 Regular Season | Western Michigan | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 1 | 20 | — | 1 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Wisconsin | 4 | 20 | — | 3 |
#1 Featured game
Michigan State
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 70 takeover score.
#2
Illinois
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#3
Indiana
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 35 takeover score.
#4
Fresno State
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 35 takeover score.
#5
Cincinnati
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 0 takeover score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2009 Regular Season · Wisconsin
4 primary output · 20 efficiency · — usage
62.7
#2
2006 Postseason · Western Michigan
50
0 primary · 0 efficiency · — usage
#3
2006 Regular Season · Western Michigan
50
0 primary · 0 efficiency · — usage
2
Impact games
1
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Career Facts
2
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
0
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 17 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.