Usage Score
49.9
Player Dossier
2006-2009UAB
QB • 6'4" • Birmingham, AL, USA
Joe Webb is a dual-threat creator with 49.9 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
49.9
Efficiency
69.5
Consistency
77.1
Season Value
73.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · UAB
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Joe Webb, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · UAB. Joe Webb is a dual-threat creator with 49.9 usage in the latest tracked season.
Joe Webb played QB for UAB. Across 4 tracked seasons, Joe Webb recorded 5,771 passing yards, 2,774 rushing yards, and 471 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2009 with UAB.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season
UAB paired 3,726 primary output with 69.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 69.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Rice
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 83.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
310.5
Efficiency
69.5
Usage
49.9
Consistency
77.1
Best Game by takeover score
UCF
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Rice: 415. SMU: 323. Troy: 190. Texas A&M: 125. Southern Miss: 161. Ole Miss: 210. Marshall: 329. UTEP: 290. Florida Atlantic: 415. Memphis: 430. East Carolina: 379. UCF: 459
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Rice: 35 by 94.3. SMU: 53 by 53.4. Troy: 46 by 53.1. Texas A&M: 29 by 57.8. Southern Miss: 37 by 54.6. Ole Miss: 32 by 63.5. Marshall: 45 by 73.2. UTEP: 35 by 76.3. Florida Atlantic: 35 by 87.6. Memphis: 46 by 74.2. East Carolina: 52 by 71.1. UCF: 53 by 74.6
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Rice
Best efficiency game
94.3 vs Rice
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/28 | vs UCF300-yard game · 3+ TD | L 27-34 | 20 | 35 | 322 | 57.1 | 3 | 1 | 74.6 | 18 | 137 | 7.60 | 1 | 53 |
| Sat 11/21 | @ East CarolinaDual-threat | L 21-37 | 19 | 27 | 247 | 70.4 | 2 | 1 | 71.1 | 25 | 132 | 5.30 | 0 | 39 |
| Sat 11/14 | @ Memphis300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 31-21 | 18 | 25 | 378 | 72.0 | 3 | 0 | 74.2 | 21 | 52 | 2.50 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 11/7 | vs Florida Atlantic3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 56-29 | 14 | 19 | 292 | 73.7 | 4 | 0 | 87.6 | 16 | 123 | 7.70 | 2 | 65 |
| Sat 10/31 | @ UTEP3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 38-33 | 8 | 15 | 127 | 53.3 | 2 | 0 | 76.3 | 20 | 163 | 8.10 | 1 | 53 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ MarshallDual-threat | L 7-27 | 16 | 27 | 200 | 59.3 | 1 | 0 | 73.2 | 18 | 129 | 7.20 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ Ole MissDual-threat | L 13-48 | 9 | 15 | 89 | 60.0 | 0 | 1 | 63.5 | 17 | 121 | 7.10 | 1 | 50 |
| Fri 10/2 | vs Southern MissDual-threat | W 30-17 | 6 | 13 | 23 | 46.2 | 1 | 0 | 54.6 | 24 | 138 | 5.80 | 1 | 31 |
| Sat 9/26 | @ Texas A&MDual-threat | L 19-56 | 8 | 18 | 60 | 44.4 | 0 | 0 | 57.8 | 11 | 65 | 5.90 | 1 | 32 |
| Sat 9/19 | @ TroyDual-threat | L 14-27 | 14 | 27 | 114 | 51.9 | 1 | 1 | 53.1 | 19 | 76 | 4 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs SMU3+ TD · Dual-threat | L 33-35 | 18 | 35 | 226 | 51.4 | 2 | 4 | 53.4 | 18 | 97 | 5.40 | 1 | 25 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Rice3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 44-24 | 12 | 15 | 221 | 80.0 | 2 | 0 | 94.3 | 20 | 194 | 9.70 | 2 | 71 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UAB
2006-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | UAB | 464 | 64.7 | 38.4 | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | UAB | 967 | 63.1 | 24.3 | 503 |
| 2008 Regular Season | UAB | 3,388 | 62.2 | 45.5 | 2,421 |
| 2009 Regular Season | UAB | 3,726 | 69.5 | 49.9 | 338 |
#1 Featured game
Rice
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
415
Primary metric
415 total offense with 94.3 efficiency.
#2
UCF
459
Primary metric
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
459 total offense with 74.6 efficiency.
#3
Florida Atlantic
415
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
415 total offense with 87.6 efficiency.
#4
Memphis
430
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
430 total offense with 74.2 efficiency.
#5
Marshall
252
Primary metric
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
252 total offense with 65.3 efficiency.
#1 Season by value score
2009 Regular Season · UAB
3,726 primary output · 69.5 efficiency · 49.9 usage
73.8
#2
2008 Regular Season · UAB
70
3,388 primary · 62.2 efficiency · 45.5 usage
#3
2006 Regular Season · UAB
47.5
464 primary · 64.7 efficiency · 38.4 usage
18
250+ passing yards
14
300+ total offense
7
3+ takeover TD games
20
Above avg efficiency
Recruit Profile
Class 2005 · Rating 0.8111
Wenonah Sch · Birmingham, AL
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
8,545
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 37 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.