Usage Score
49.9
Player Profile
Joe Webb
QB • 6'4" • Birmingham, AL, USA
Dual-threat creatorVolume operator
Joe Webb is a dual-threat creator with 49.9 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
69.5
Consistency
77.1
Season Value
73.8
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · UAB
06070809
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Primary stop by seasons
- UAB
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · UAB
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Rice
Joe Webb, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · UAB. Joe Webb is a dual-threat creator with 49.9 usage in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season
UAB paired 3,726 primary output with 69.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 69.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Rice
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 83.3th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Regular Season · UAB
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
310.5
Efficiency
69.5
Usage
49.9
Consistency
77.1
Best Game by takeover score
UCF
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Rice: 415. SMU: 323. Troy: 190. Texas A&M: 125. Southern Miss: 161. Ole Miss: 210. Marshall: 329. UTEP: 290. Florida Atlantic: 415. Memphis: 430. East Carolina: 379. UCF: 459
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Rice: 35 by 94.3. SMU: 53 by 53.4. Troy: 46 by 53.1. Texas A&M: 29 by 57.8. Southern Miss: 37 by 54.6. Ole Miss: 32 by 63.5. Marshall: 45 by 73.2. UTEP: 35 by 76.3. Florida Atlantic: 35 by 87.6. Memphis: 46 by 74.2. East Carolina: 52 by 71.1. UCF: 53 by 74.6
Split Comparison
Wins342.2 · n=5 · +54.3 vs Losses
Losses287.9 · n=7 · -54.3 vs Wins
First Half237.3 · n=6 · -146.3 vs Second Half
Second Half383.7 · n=6 · +146.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Rice
Best efficiency game
94.3 vs Rice
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/28 | vs UCF300-yard game · 3+ TD | L 27-34 | 20 | 35 | 322 | 57.1 | 3 | 1 | 74.6 | 18 | 137 | 7.60 | 1 | 53 |
| Sat 11/21 | @ East CarolinaDual-threat | L 21-37 | 19 | 27 | 247 | 70.4 | 2 | 1 | 71.1 | 25 | 132 | 5.30 | 0 | 39 |
| Sat 11/14 | @ Memphis300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 31-21 | 18 | 25 | 378 | 72.0 | 3 | 0 | 74.2 | 21 | 52 | 2.50 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 11/7 | vs Florida Atlantic3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 56-29 | 14 | 19 | 292 | 73.7 | 4 | 0 | 87.6 | 16 | 123 | 7.70 | 2 | 65 |
| Sat 10/31 | @ UTEP3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 38-33 | 8 | 15 | 127 | 53.3 | 2 | 0 | 76.3 | 20 | 163 | 8.10 | 1 | 53 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ MarshallDual-threat | L 7-27 | 16 | 27 | 200 | 59.3 | 1 | 0 | 73.2 | 18 | 129 | 7.20 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ Ole MissDual-threat | L 13-48 | 9 | 15 | 89 | 60.0 | 0 | 1 | 63.5 | 17 | 121 | 7.10 | 1 | 50 |
| Fri 10/2 | vs Southern MissDual-threat | W 30-17 | 6 | 13 | 23 | 46.2 | 1 | 0 | 54.6 | 24 | 138 | 5.80 | 1 | 31 |
| Sat 9/26 | @ Texas A&MDual-threat | L 19-56 | 8 | 18 | 60 | 44.4 | 0 | 0 | 57.8 | 11 | 65 | 5.90 | 1 | 32 |
| Sat 9/19 | @ TroyDual-threat | L 14-27 | 14 | 27 | 114 | 51.9 | 1 | 1 | 53.1 | 19 | 76 | 4 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs SMU3+ TD · Dual-threat | L 33-35 | 18 | 35 | 226 | 51.4 | 2 | 4 | 53.4 | 18 | 97 | 5.40 | 1 | 25 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Rice3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 44-24 | 12 | 15 | 221 | 80.0 | 2 | 0 | 94.3 | 20 | 194 | 9.70 | 2 | 71 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UAB
2006-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
2006200720082009
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | UAB | 464 | 64.7 | 38.4 | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | UAB | 967 | 63.1 | 24.3 | 503 |
| 2008 Regular Season | UAB | 3,388 | 62.2 | 45.5 | 2,421 |
| 2009 Regular Season | UAB | 3,726 | 69.5 | 49.9 | 338 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Rice
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
415
Primary metric
415 total offense with 94.3 efficiency.
#2
UCF
459
Primary metric
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
459 total offense with 74.6 efficiency.
#3
Florida Atlantic
415
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
415 total offense with 87.6 efficiency.
#4
Memphis
430
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
430 total offense with 74.2 efficiency.
#5
Marshall
252
Primary metric
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
252 total offense with 65.3 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2009 Regular Season · UAB
3,726 primary output · 69.5 efficiency · 49.9 usage
73.8
#2
2008 Regular Season · UAB
70
3,388 primary · 62.2 efficiency · 45.5 usage
#3
2006 Regular Season · UAB
47.5
464 primary · 64.7 efficiency · 38.4 usage
Milestones
18
250+ passing yards
14
300+ total offense
7
3+ takeover TD games
20
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2005 · Rating 0.8111
Wenonah Sch · Birmingham, AL
- Committed To
- UAB
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2005
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
8,545
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 37 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.