Usage Score
7.4
Player Dossier
2006-2009Georgia
QB • 6'1" • Charlotte, NC, USA
Joe Cox is a balanced quarterback profile with 7.4 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
7.4
Efficiency
57.1
Consistency
73.4
Season Value
59.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2009 Postseason · Georgia
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Joe Cox, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2009 Postseason · Georgia. Joe Cox is a balanced quarterback profile with 7.4 usage in the latest tracked season.
Joe Cox played QB for Georgia. Across 4 tracked seasons, Joe Cox recorded 3,016 passing yards, -13 rushing yards, and 29 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2009 with Georgia.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
Georgia paired 2,556 primary output with 57.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 57.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas
Win with 364 yards of offense and 64 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Primary Metric / G
196.6
Efficiency
57.1
Usage
7.4
Consistency
73.4
Best Game by takeover score
Arkansas
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas A&M: 164. Oklahoma State: 153. South Carolina: 177. Arkansas: 364. Arizona State: 248. LSU: 237. Tennessee: 156. Vanderbilt: 219. Florida: 162. Tennessee Tech: 148. Auburn: 171. Kentucky: 285. Georgia Tech: 72
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas A&M: 29 by 61.6. Oklahoma State: 32 by 45.4. South Carolina: 28 by 56. Arkansas: 29 by 64. Arizona State: 33 by 56. LSU: 35 by 69.3. Tennessee: 36 by 54.5. Vanderbilt: 32 by 49.9. Florida: 24 by 40.9. Tennessee Tech: 14 by 86.7. Auburn: 21 by 59.4. Kentucky: 33 by 48.5. Georgia Tech: 16 by 50.6
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Arkansas
Best efficiency game
86.7 vs Tennessee Tech
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/28 | vs Texas A&M | W 44-20 | 15 | 28 | 158 | 53.6 | 2 | 1 | 61.6 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sun 11/29 | @ Georgia Tech | W 30-24 | 8 | 14 | 76 | 57.1 | 1 | 0 | 50.6 | 2 | -4 | -2 | 0 | 1 |
| Sun 11/22 | vs Kentucky3+ TD | L 27-34 | 12 | 30 | 291 | 40.0 | 3 | 2 | 48.5 | 3 | -6 | -2 | 0 | 2 |
| Sun 11/15 | vs Auburn | W 31-24 | 9 | 17 | 173 | 52.9 | 1 | 0 | 59.4 | 4 | -2 | -0.50 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/7 | vs Tennessee Tech | W 38-0 | 10 | 13 | 140 | 76.9 | 2 | 0 | 86.7 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/31 | @ Florida | L 17-41 | 11 | 20 | 165 | 55.0 | 2 | 3 | 40.9 | 4 | -3 | -0.80 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ Vanderbilt | W 34-10 | 16 | 31 | 226 | 51.6 | 2 | 1 | 49.9 | 1 | -7 | -7 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 10/10 | @ Tennessee | L 19-45 | 19 | 34 | 146 | 55.9 | 0 | 2 | 54.5 | 2 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/3 | vs LSU | L 13-20 | 18 | 34 | 229 | 52.9 | 2 | 1 | 69.3 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs Arizona State | W 20-17 | 17 | 31 | 242 | 54.8 | 1 | 2 | 56 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 9/19 | @ Arkansas300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 52-41 | 18 | 25 | 375 | 72.0 | 5 | 1 | 64 | 4 | -11 | -2.80 | 0 | 1 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs South Carolina | W 41-37 | 17 | 24 | 201 | 70.8 | 2 | 1 | 56 | 4 | -24 | -6 | 0 | 2 |
| Sat 9/5 | @ Oklahoma State | L 10-24 | 15 | 30 | 162 | 50.0 | 1 | 1 | 45.4 | 2 | -9 | -4.50 | 0 | 0 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Georgia
2006-2009
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | Georgia | 226 | 64.9 | 3.7 | — |
| 2007 Postseason | Georgia | 56 | 47 | — | -170 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Georgia | 56 | 47 | — | 0 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Georgia | 165 | 72.5 | 3.2 | 109 |
| 2009 Postseason | Georgia | 2,556 | 57.1 | 7.4 | 2,391 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Georgia | 2,556 | 57.1 | 7.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Colorado
Win with 154 yards of offense and 91.9 efficiency.
154
Primary metric
154 total offense with 91.9 efficiency.
#2
Western Carolina
48
Primary metric
Win with 48 yards of offense and 72.2 efficiency.
48 total offense with 72.2 efficiency.
#3
Central Michigan
74
Primary metric
Win with 74 yards of offense and 75 efficiency.
74 total offense with 75 efficiency.
#4
Arkansas
364
Primary metric
Win with 364 yards of offense and 64 efficiency.
364 total offense with 64 efficiency.
#5
LSU
237
Primary metric
Loss with 237 yards of offense and 69.3 efficiency.
237 total offense with 69.3 efficiency.
#1 Season by Season Value
2009 Postseason · Georgia
2,556 primary output · 57.1 efficiency · 7.4 usage
59.5
#2
2009 Regular Season · Georgia
59.5
2,556 primary · 57.1 efficiency · 7.4 usage
#3
2008 Regular Season · Georgia
40
165 primary · 72.5 efficiency · 3.2 usage
2
250+ passing yards
1
300+ total offense
2
3+ TD games
11
Above avg efficiency
Recruit Profile
Class 2002 · Rating 0.8667
West Monroe · West Monroe, LA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
3,003
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 25 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.