Usage Score
13.6
Player Dossier
2006-2009Florida Atlantic
WR • 6'3" • Tampa, FL, USA
Chris Bonner reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
13.6
Efficiency
86.1
Consistency
36.2
Season Value
59
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2009 Regular Season · Florida Atlantic
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Chris Bonner, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2009 Regular Season · Florida Atlantic. Chris Bonner reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Chris Bonner played WR for Florida Atlantic. Across 4 tracked seasons, Chris Bonner recorded 88 rushing yards, 1,591 receiving yards, and 13 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2009 with Florida Atlantic.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season
Florida Atlantic paired 571 primary output with 86.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 86.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2009 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: North Texas
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
47.6
Efficiency
86.1
Usage
13.6
Consistency
36.2
Best Game by takeover score
North Texas
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Nebraska: 27. South Carolina: 57. UL Monroe: 67. Wyoming: 13. North Texas: 134. Louisiana: 134. Middle Tennessee: 19. UAB: 24. Arkansas State: 12. Troy: 28. Western Kentucky: 0. Florida International: 56
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Nebraska: 2 by 90. South Carolina: 6 by 63.3. UL Monroe: 4 by 100. Wyoming: 1 by 86.7. North Texas: 6 by 100. Louisiana: 2 by 100. Middle Tennessee: 1 by 100. UAB: 2 by 80. Arkansas State: 1 by 80. Troy: 4 by 46.7. Florida International: 3 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
North Texas
Best efficiency game
100 vs Florida International
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/6 | @ Florida International | W 28-21 | — | 3 | 56 | 18.7 | 18.70 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 11/28 | vs Western Kentucky | W 29-23 | — | — | — | 8 | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/21 | @ Troy | L 21-47 | — | 4 | 28 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 8 |
| Sat 11/14 | vs Arkansas State | W 35-18 | — | 1 | 12 | 7.5 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 11/7 | @ UAB | L 29-56 | — | 2 | 24 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs Middle Tennessee | L 20-27 | — | 1 | 19 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Louisiana100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 51-29 | — | 2 | 134 | 67 | 67 | 2 | 70 |
| Sun 10/18 | @ North Texas100 receiving yards | W 44-40 | — | 6 | 134 | 19.6 | 22.30 | 1 | 51 |
| Sat 10/3 | vs Wyoming | L 28-30 | — | 1 | 13 | 24.5 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs UL Monroe | L 25-27 | — | 4 | 67 | 16.8 | 16.80 | 1 | 35 |
| Sat 9/19 | @ South Carolina | L 16-38 | — | 6 | 57 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 1 | 23 |
| Sat 9/5 | @ Nebraska | L 3-49 | — | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 17 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Florida Atlantic
2006-2009
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | Florida Atlantic | 178 | 66.4 | 9.2 | — |
| 2007 Postseason | Florida Atlantic | 420 | 93.3 | 11.4 | 242 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Florida Atlantic | 420 | 93.3 | 11.4 | 0 |
| 2008 Postseason | Florida Atlantic | 422 | 87.8 | 10.9 | 2 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Florida Atlantic | 422 | 87.8 | 10.9 | 0 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Florida Atlantic | 571 | 86.1 | 13.6 | 149 |
#1 Featured game
North Texas
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
134
Primary metric
134 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Florida International
139
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
139 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Florida
96
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
96 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Kansas State
50
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
50 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Louisiana
134
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
134 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2009 Regular Season · Florida Atlantic
571 primary output · 86.1 efficiency · 13.6 usage
59
#2
2007 Postseason · Florida Atlantic
58.5
420 primary · 93.3 efficiency · 11.4 usage
#3
2007 Regular Season · Florida Atlantic
58.5
420 primary · 93.3 efficiency · 11.4 usage
3
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2003 · Rating 0.7667
Wyoming Seminary Upper School · Kingston, PA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,591
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 45 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.