Usage / Role
100%
Featured offensive role
Player Dossier
2006-2008Buffalo
RB • 6'2" • 217 lbs • Niagara Falls, NY, USA
James Starks leans workhorse runner traits and 49.8 efficiency.
Usage / Role
100%
Featured offensive role
Impact Production
89
Top-tier box-score impact for a back
Reliability
100
Regular contributor with several takeover games
Star Power
66
Useful peak profile
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2008 Postseason · Buffalo
Snapshot
Player Story
James Starks built his college career from 2006 through 2008 as a running back from Niagara Falls, NY wearing No. 19, spending time with Buffalo. The clearest part of James Starks' career was his backfield work:...
Read the storyJames Starks, RB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2008 Postseason · Buffalo. James Starks leans workhorse runner traits and 49.8 efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | Buffalo | 12 | 930 | 704 | 226 | 6 | 65.6 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Buffalo | 12 | 1,414 | 1,103 | 311 | 14 | 72.9 |
| 2008 Postseason | Buffalo | 12 | 46 | 25 | 21 | 1 | 81 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Buffalo | 12 | 1,648 | 1,308 | 340 | 16 | 81 |
Related Context
James Starks played RB for Buffalo. Across 3 tracked seasons, James Starks recorded 5 passing yards, 3,140 rushing yards, and 898 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2008 with Buffalo.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason
Buffalo paired 1,694 primary output with 49.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2008 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 49.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2008 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ohio
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Scrimmage Yards / G
141.2
Efficiency
49.8
Usage
47.8
Consistency
74.2
Best Game by takeover score
Ohio
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UConn: 46. UTEP: 183. Pittsburgh: 104. Temple: 20. Central Michigan: 191. Western Michigan: 149. Ohio: 201. Miami (OH): 186. Akron: 241. Bowling Green: 109. Kent State: 137. Ball State: 127
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UConn: 24 by 20. UTEP: 32 by 59.9. Pittsburgh: 22 by 50. Temple: 8 by 26. Central Michigan: 27 by 56.2. Western Michigan: 32 by 47.3. Ohio: 31 by 65.6. Miami (OH): 28 by 70.2. Akron: 50 by 45.6. Bowling Green: 21 by 49.3. Kent State: 26 by 57.4. Ball State: 23 by 50
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Ohio
Best efficiency game
70.2 vs Miami (OH)
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/3 | @ UConn | L 20-38 | 13 | 25 | 1.90 | 1 | 11 | 21 | 1.9 |
| Sat 12/6 | vs Ball State | W 42-24 | 19 | 82 | 4.30 | 1 | 4 | 45 | 5.5 |
| Fri 11/28 | vs Kent State100 rush yards | L 21-24 | 24 | 136 | 5.70 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5.3 |
| Fri 11/21 | @ Bowling Green2+ TD | W 40-34 | 14 | 62 | 4.40 | 2 | 7 | 47 | 5.2 |
| Fri 11/14 | @ Akron100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 43-40 | 37 | 151 | 4.10 | 3 | 13 | 90 | 4.8 |
| Wed 11/5 | vs Miami (OH)100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 37-17 | 26 | 177 | 6.80 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 6.6 |
| Tue 10/28 | @ Ohio100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 32-19 | 30 | 185 | 6.20 | 2 | 1 | 16 | 6.5 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Western Michigan100 rush yards · 2+ TD | L 28-34 | 28 | 125 | 4.50 | 3 | 4 | 24 | 4.7 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Central Michigan150 scrimmage yards · 2+ TD | L 25-27 | 22 | 94 | 4.30 | 1 | 5 | 97 | 7.1 |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Temple | W 30-28 | 8 | 20 | 2.50 | 0 | — | — | 2.5 |
| Sat 9/6 | @ Pittsburgh | L 16-27 | 20 | 97 | 4.80 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 4.7 |
| Thu 8/28 | vs UTEP100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 42-17 | 31 | 179 | 5.80 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5.7 |
Player Story
James Starks built his college career from 2006 through 2008 as a running back from Niagara Falls, NY wearing No. 19, spending time with Buffalo. The clearest part of James Starks' career was his backfield work: 3,140 rushing yards, 698 carries, 34 rushing touchdowns, and 898 receiving yards across 36 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2008 with Buffalo. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
The value of the career arc is that it connects production to role, not just a name on a roster. His career also includes 5 passing yards and 898 receiving yards, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. With 36 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across Buffalo.
The arc is straightforward: James Starks moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Buffalo
2006-2008
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | Buffalo | 930 | 40.6 | 38.3 | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | Buffalo | 1,414 | 45.4 | 43.4 | 484 |
| 2008 Postseason | Buffalo | 1,694 | 49.8 | 47.8 | 280 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Buffalo | 1,694 | 49.8 | 47.8 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
vs Toledo
Week 7 · W 43-33 · Conference game
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
244
Scrimmage Yards
90.5 takeover
244 scrimmage yards and 68.6 usage.
#2
vs Miami (OH)
Week 7 · L 31-38 · Conference game
181
Scrimmage Yards
89.5 takeover
Loss with 181 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
181 scrimmage yards and 57.1 usage.
#3
vs Kent State
Week 10 · W 41-14 · Conference game
162
Scrimmage Yards
85.6 takeover
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
162 scrimmage yards and 56.3 usage.
#4
@ Miami (OH)
Week 10 · L 28-31 · Conference game
188
Scrimmage Yards
84.6 takeover
Loss with 188 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
188 scrimmage yards and 46.7 usage.
#5
@ Ohio
Week 10 · W 32-19 · Conference game
201
Scrimmage Yards
83 takeover
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
201 scrimmage yards and 52.5 usage.
#1 Season by Season Value
2008 Postseason · Buffalo
1,694 primary output · 49.8 efficiency · 47.8 usage
81
#2
2008 Regular Season · Buffalo
81
1,694 primary · 49.8 efficiency · 47.8 usage
#3
2007 Regular Season · Buffalo
72.9
1,414 primary · 45.4 efficiency · 43.4 usage
12
100+ rush yards
10
150+ scrimmage yards
11
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.