Usage Score
27
Player Profile
Brett Hamlin
WR • 6'1" • Jupiter, FL, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Brett Hamlin reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
86.2
Consistency
65.2
Season Value
69.5
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · Buffalo
050607080809
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Primary stop by seasons
- Buffalo
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · Buffalo
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Western Michigan
Brett Hamlin, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · Buffalo. Brett Hamlin reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season
Buffalo paired 898 primary output with 86.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 86.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2009 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Western Michigan
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Regular Season · Buffalo
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
74.8
Efficiency
86.2
Usage
27
Consistency
65.2
Best Game by takeover score
Kent State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UTEP: 16. Pittsburgh: 149. UCF: 34. Temple: 70. Central Michigan: 43. Unknown: 132. Akron: 76. Western Michigan: 146. Bowling Green: 54. Ohio: 75. Miami (OH): 17. Kent State: 86
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UTEP: 3 by 35.6. Pittsburgh: 12 by 82.8. UCF: 5 by 45.3. Temple: 6 by 77.8. Central Michigan: 3 by 95.6. Unknown: 6 by 100. Akron: 5 by 100. Western Michigan: 10 by 97.3. Bowling Green: 3 by 100. Ohio: 5 by 100. Miami (OH): 1 by 100. Kent State: 5 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins48.8 · n=4 · -32.8 vs Losses
Losses81.6 · n=7 · +32.8 vs Wins
First Half74 · n=6 · -1.7 vs Second Half
Second Half75.7 · n=6 · +1.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Western Michigan
Best efficiency game
100 vs Kent State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/27 | @ Kent State | W 9-6 | — | 5 | 86 | 17.2 | 17.20 | 0 | 32 |
| Wed 11/18 | @ Miami (OH) | W 42-17 | — | 1 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 17 |
| Wed 11/11 | vs Ohio | L 24-27 | — | 5 | 75 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 24 |
| Wed 11/4 | vs Bowling Green | L 29-30 | — | 3 | 54 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Western Michigan100 receiving yards · High volume | L 31-34 | — | 10 | 146 | 14.6 | 14.60 | 1 | 33 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs Akron | W 21-17 | — | 5 | 76 | 15.2 | 15.20 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards | — | — | 6 | 132 | 22 | 22 | 1 | 50 |
| Sat 10/3 | vs Central Michigan | L 13-20 | — | 3 | 43 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 9/26 | @ Temple | L 13-37 | — | 6 | 70 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 9/19 | @ UCF | L 17-23 | — | 5 | 34 | 6.8 | 6.80 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs Pittsburgh100 receiving yards · High volume | L 27-54 | — | 12 | 149 | 12.4 | 12.40 | 0 | 32 |
| Sun 9/6 | @ UTEP | W 23-17 | — | 3 | 16 | 5.3 | 5.30 | 0 | 6 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Buffalo
2005-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
200520062007200820082009
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 Regular Season | Buffalo | 371 | 58.3 | 22.7 | — |
| 2006 Regular Season | Buffalo | 47 | 45.6 | 16.3 | -324 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Buffalo | 415 | 73.3 | 16.6 | 368 |
| 2008 Postseason | Buffalo | 459 | 72.2 | 13.2 | 44 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Buffalo | 459 | 72.2 | 13.2 | 0 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Buffalo | 898 | 86.2 | 27 | 439 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Western Michigan
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
146
Primary metric
146 receiving yards with a 97.3 efficiency score.
#2
Pittsburgh
149
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
149 receiving yards with a 82.8 efficiency score.
#3
Toledo
84
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
84 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Pittsburgh
77
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
77 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Unknown
132
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
132 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2009 Regular Season · Buffalo
898 primary output · 86.2 efficiency · 27 usage
69.5
#2
2007 Regular Season · Buffalo
50
415 primary · 73.3 efficiency · 16.6 usage
#3
2008 Postseason · Buffalo
49.8
459 primary · 72.2 efficiency · 13.2 usage
Milestones
4
100+ receiving yards
3
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2005 · Rating 0.7667
Dwyer · Palm Beach Gardens, FL
- Committed To
- Buffalo
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2005
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,190
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 47 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.