Usage Score
27
Player Dossier
2005-2009Buffalo
WR • 6'1" • Jupiter, FL, USA
Brett Hamlin reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
27
Efficiency
86.2
Consistency
65.2
Season Value
69.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · Buffalo
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Brett Hamlin, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · Buffalo. Brett Hamlin reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Brett Hamlin played WR for Buffalo. Across 5 tracked seasons, Brett Hamlin recorded 28 passing yards, 12 rushing yards, and 2,190 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2009 with Buffalo.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season
Buffalo paired 898 primary output with 86.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 86.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2009 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Western Michigan
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 91.7th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
74.8
Efficiency
86.2
Usage
27
Consistency
65.2
Best Game by takeover score
Kent State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UTEP: 16. Pittsburgh: 149. UCF: 34. Temple: 70. Central Michigan: 43. Unknown: 132. Akron: 76. Western Michigan: 146. Bowling Green: 54. Ohio: 75. Miami (OH): 17. Kent State: 86
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UTEP: 3 by 35.6. Pittsburgh: 12 by 82.8. UCF: 5 by 45.3. Temple: 6 by 77.8. Central Michigan: 3 by 95.6. Unknown: 6 by 100. Akron: 5 by 100. Western Michigan: 10 by 97.3. Bowling Green: 3 by 100. Ohio: 5 by 100. Miami (OH): 1 by 100. Kent State: 5 by 100
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Western Michigan
Best efficiency game
100 vs Kent State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/27 | @ Kent State | W 9-6 | — | 5 | 86 | 17.2 | 17.20 | 0 | 32 |
| Wed 11/18 | @ Miami (OH) | W 42-17 | — | 1 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 17 |
| Wed 11/11 | vs Ohio | L 24-27 | — | 5 | 75 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 24 |
| Wed 11/4 | vs Bowling Green | L 29-30 | — | 3 | 54 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Western Michigan100 receiving yards · High volume | L 31-34 | — | 10 | 146 | 14.6 | 14.60 | 1 | 33 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs Akron | W 21-17 | — | 5 | 76 | 15.2 | 15.20 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards | — | — | 6 | 132 | 22 | 22 | 1 | 50 |
| Sat 10/3 | vs Central Michigan | L 13-20 | — | 3 | 43 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 9/26 | @ Temple | L 13-37 | — | 6 | 70 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 9/19 | @ UCF | L 17-23 | — | 5 | 34 | 6.8 | 6.80 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs Pittsburgh100 receiving yards · High volume | L 27-54 | — | 12 | 149 | 12.4 | 12.40 | 0 | 32 |
| Sun 9/6 | @ UTEP | W 23-17 | — | 3 | 16 | 5.3 | 5.30 | 0 | 6 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Buffalo
2005-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 Regular Season | Buffalo | 371 | 58.3 | 22.7 | — |
| 2006 Regular Season | Buffalo | 47 | 45.6 | 16.3 | -324 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Buffalo | 415 | 73.3 | 16.6 | 368 |
| 2008 Postseason | Buffalo | 459 | 72.2 | 13.2 | 44 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Buffalo | 459 | 72.2 | 13.2 | 0 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Buffalo | 898 | 86.2 | 27 | 439 |
#1 Featured game
Western Michigan
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
146
Primary metric
146 receiving yards with a 97.3 efficiency score.
#2
Pittsburgh
149
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
149 receiving yards with a 82.8 efficiency score.
#3
Toledo
84
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
84 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Pittsburgh
77
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
77 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Unknown
132
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
132 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2009 Regular Season · Buffalo
898 primary output · 86.2 efficiency · 27 usage
69.5
#2
2007 Regular Season · Buffalo
50
415 primary · 73.3 efficiency · 16.6 usage
#3
2008 Postseason · Buffalo
49.8
459 primary · 72.2 efficiency · 13.2 usage
4
100+ receiving yards
3
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2005 · Rating 0.7667
Dwyer · Palm Beach Gardens, FL
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,190
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 47 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.