Usage Score
40.1
Player Dossier
2006-2009Bowling Green
Freddie Barnes
WR • 6'2" • Chicago Hts., IL, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Freddie Barnes reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
73.5
Consistency
69.8
Season Value
70.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Bowling Green
060707080909
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Bowling Green
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Ohio
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Freddie Barnes, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Bowling Green. Freddie Barnes reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
Bowling Green paired 1,770 primary output with 73.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 73.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kent State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Postseason · Bowling Green
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
136.2
Efficiency
73.5
Usage
40.1
Consistency
69.8
Best Game by takeover score
Idaho
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Idaho: 219. Troy: 157. Missouri: 70. Marshall: 109. Boise State: 24. Ohio: 84. Kent State: 278. Ball State: 160. Central Michigan: 172. Buffalo: 122. Miami (OH): 109. Akron: 197. Toledo: 69
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Idaho: 17 by 85.9. Troy: 15 by 69.8. Missouri: 10 by 46.7. Marshall: 17 by 42.7. Boise State: 4 by 40. Ohio: 7 by 80. Kent State: 22 by 84.2. Ball State: 10 by 100. Central Michigan: 14 by 81.9. Buffalo: 8 by 100. Miami (OH): 10 by 72.7. Akron: 12 by 100. Toledo: 9 by 51.1
Split Comparison
Wins156 · n=7 · +43 vs Losses
Losses113 · n=6 · -43 vs Wins
First Half134.4 · n=7 · -3.7 vs Second Half
Second Half138.2 · n=6 · +3.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Kent State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Akron
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/30 | @ Idaho100 receiving yards · High volume | L 42-43 | — | 17 | 219 | 12.3 | 12.90 | 3 | 51 |
| Fri 11/27 | vs ToledoHigh volume · 2+ TD | W 38-24 | — | 9 | 69 | 7.7 | 7.70 | 2 | 17 |
| Fri 11/20 | vs Akron100 receiving yards · High volume | W 36-20 | — | 12 | 197 | 13.3 | 16.40 | 2 | 53 |
| Thu 11/12 | @ Miami (OH)100 receiving yards · High volume | W 35-14 | — | 10 | 109 | 10.3 | 10.90 | 2 | 59 |
| Wed 11/4 | @ Buffalo100 receiving yards · High volume | W 30-29 | — | 8 | 122 | 12.7 | 15.30 | 1 | 23 |
| Sat 10/24 | vs Central Michigan100 receiving yards · High volume | L 10-24 | — | 14 | 172 | 10.1 | 12.30 | 1 | 51 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ Ball State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 31-17 | — | 10 | 160 | 14.3 | 16 | 3 | 41 |
| Sat 10/10 | @ Kent State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 36-35 | — | 22 | 278 | 11.5 | 12.60 | 3 | 55 |
| Sat 10/3 | vs Ohio | L 37-44 | — | 7 | 84 | 9.9 | 12 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs Boise State | L 14-49 | — | 4 | 24 | 1.8 | 6 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/19 | @ Marshall100 receiving yards · High volume | L 10-17 | — | 17 | 109 | 6.4 | 6.40 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/12 | @ MissouriHigh volume | L 20-27 | — | 10 | 70 | 7.8 | 7 | 0 | 15 |
| Thu 9/3 | vs Troy100 receiving yards · High volume | W 31-14 | — | 15 | 157 | 9.5 | 10.50 | 2 | 31 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Bowling Green
2006-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
200620072007200820092009
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 203 | 59.1 | 22 | — |
| 2007 Postseason | Bowling Green | 962 | 78.4 | 25.4 | 759 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 962 | 78.4 | 25.4 | 0 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 364 | 56.2 | 19 | -598 |
| 2009 Postseason | Bowling Green | 1,770 | 73.5 | 40.1 | 1,406 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Bowling Green | 1,770 | 73.5 | 40.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Ohio
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
68
Primary metric
68 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Kent State
278
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
278 receiving yards with a 84.2 efficiency score.
#3
Akron
197
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
197 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Buffalo
113
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
113 receiving yards with a 75.3 efficiency score.
#5
Idaho
219
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
219 receiving yards with a 85.9 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2009 Postseason · Bowling Green
1,770 primary output · 73.5 efficiency · 40.1 usage
70.8
#2
2009 Regular Season · Bowling Green
70.8
1,770 primary · 73.5 efficiency · 40.1 usage
#3
2007 Postseason · Bowling Green
59.9
962 primary · 78.4 efficiency · 25.4 usage
Milestones
12
100+ receiving yards
18
8+ catch outings
9
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2003 · Rating 0.7667
Gilbert · Gilbert, AZ
- Committed To
- San Diego State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2003
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
3,299
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 45 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.