Usage Score
24.5
Player Dossier
2006-2009New Mexico
QB • 6'3" • Port Arthur, TX, USA
Donovan Porterie is a balanced quarterback profile with 24.5 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
24.5
Efficiency
48.9
Consistency
81.7
Season Value
58.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2007 Postseason · New Mexico
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Donovan Porterie, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2007 Postseason · New Mexico. Donovan Porterie is a balanced quarterback profile with 24.5 usage in the latest tracked season.
Donovan Porterie played QB for New Mexico. Across 4 tracked seasons, Donovan Porterie recorded 6,756 passing yards, -41 rushing yards, and 28 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2007 with New Mexico.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2007 Postseason
New Mexico paired 2,972 primary output with 55.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 48.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2009 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UNLV
Loss with 236 yards of offense and 60.4 efficiency. It landed in the 75th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
198.2
Efficiency
48.9
Usage
24.5
Consistency
81.7
Best Game by takeover score
UNLV
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas A&M: 180. Tulsa: 84. Air Force: 34. New Mexico State: 213. Texas Tech: 326. Wyoming: 219. UNLV: 236. San Diego State: 268. Utah: 179. BYU: 258. Colorado State: 214. TCU: 167
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas A&M: 49 by 54.1. Tulsa: 30 by 42.1. Air Force: 11 by 36.7. New Mexico State: 31 by 56.9. Texas Tech: 63 by 53.7. Wyoming: 47 by 49.4. UNLV: 42 by 60.4. San Diego State: 60 by 49.1. Utah: 36 by 42.6. BYU: 55 by 53.8. Colorado State: 44 by 51.6. TCU: 50 by 37
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
UNLV
Best efficiency game
60.4 vs UNLV
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/28 | @ TCU | L 10-51 | 20 | 43 | 162 | 46.5 | 0 | 4 | 37 | 7 | 5 | 0.70 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 11/21 | vs Colorado State | W 29-27 | 22 | 37 | 197 | 59.5 | 2 | 2 | 51.6 | 7 | 17 | 2.40 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 11/14 | vs BYU3+ TD | L 19-24 | 28 | 44 | 272 | 63.6 | 2 | 0 | 53.8 | 11 | -14 | -1.30 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 11/7 | @ Utah | L 14-45 | 15 | 32 | 186 | 46.9 | 1 | 2 | 42.6 | 4 | -7 | -1.80 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/31 | @ San Diego State | L 20-23 | 27 | 52 | 277 | 51.9 | 1 | 0 | 49.1 | 8 | -9 | -1.10 | 1 | 8 |
| Sun 10/25 | vs UNLV | L 17-34 | 20 | 30 | 219 | 66.7 | 2 | 0 | 60.4 | 12 | 17 | 1.40 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/10 | @ Wyoming | L 13-37 | 26 | 40 | 252 | 65.0 | 1 | 2 | 49.4 | 7 | -33 | -4.70 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ Texas Tech300-yard game | L 28-48 | 30 | 56 | 316 | 53.6 | 2 | 0 | 53.7 | 7 | 10 | 1.40 | 0 | 9 |
| Sun 9/27 | vs New Mexico State | L 17-20 | 16 | 28 | 206 | 57.1 | 1 | 1 | 56.9 | 3 | 7 | 2.30 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Air Force | L 13-37 | 4 | 8 | 29 | 50.0 | 0 | 1 | 36.7 | 3 | 5 | 1.70 | 0 | 6 |
| Sun 9/13 | vs Tulsa | L 10-44 | 12 | 22 | 85 | 54.5 | 0 | 1 | 42.1 | 8 | -1 | -0.10 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/5 | @ Texas A&M | L 6-41 | 29 | 40 | 210 | 72.5 | 0 | 0 | 54.1 | 9 | -30 | -3.30 | 0 | 3 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
New Mexico
2006-2009
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Postseason | New Mexico | 946 | 60.2 | 11.6 | — |
| 2006 Regular Season | New Mexico | 946 | 60.2 | 11.6 | 0 |
| 2007 Postseason | New Mexico | 2,972 | 55.5 | 13.2 | 2,026 |
| 2007 Regular Season | New Mexico | 2,972 | 55.5 | 13.2 | 0 |
| 2008 Regular Season | New Mexico | 419 | 50.1 | 15.1 | -2,553 |
| 2009 Regular Season | New Mexico | 2,378 | 48.9 | 24.5 | 1,959 |
#1 Featured game
UNLV
Loss with 236 yards of offense and 60.4 efficiency.
236
Primary metric
236 total offense with 60.4 efficiency.
#2
Texas A&M
199
Primary metric
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
199 total offense with 60.2 efficiency.
#3
New Mexico State
348
Primary metric
Win with 348 yards of offense and 71.5 efficiency.
348 total offense with 71.5 efficiency.
#4
Utah
359
Primary metric
Win with 359 yards of offense and 64.1 efficiency.
359 total offense with 64.1 efficiency.
#5
Nevada
361
Primary metric
Win with 361 yards of offense and 59.5 efficiency.
361 total offense with 59.5 efficiency.
#1 Season by Season Value
2007 Postseason · New Mexico
2,972 primary output · 55.5 efficiency · 13.2 usage
62.6
#2
2007 Regular Season · New Mexico
62.6
2,972 primary · 55.5 efficiency · 13.2 usage
#3
2009 Regular Season · New Mexico
58.8
2,378 primary · 48.9 efficiency · 24.5 usage
8
250+ passing yards
5
300+ total offense
3
3+ TD games
9
Above avg efficiency
Recruit Profile
Class 2003 · Rating 0.8667
Taft · Woodland Hills, CA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
6,715
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 37 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.