Player Stats

Tony Pike College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Total offense
5,146
Passing yards
5,018
Rushing yards
128
Touchdowns
52

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTotal OffensePass YdsRush YdsTDOverall
2007 Regular SeasonCincinnati41669175126
2008 PostseasonCincinnati122432394165.1
2008 Regular SeasonCincinnati122,2112,168431965.1
2009 PostseasonCincinnati10158170-12367.8
2009 Regular SeasonCincinnati102,3682,350182867.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason

Cincinnati paired 2,526 primary output with 60.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2009 Postseason role shape

pass-led usage with 60.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Fresno State

Win with 315 yards of offense and 75.7 efficiency. It landed in the 70th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2009 Postseason · Cincinnati

Games

10

Primary Metric / G

252.6

Efficiency

60.2

Usage

16.3

Consistency

74.8

Best Game by takeover score

Fresno State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Florida: 158. Rutgers: 369. Southeast Missouri State: 230. Oregon State: 347. Fresno State: 315. Miami (OH): 273. South Florida: 125. West Virginia: 16. Illinois: 402. Pittsburgh: 291

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida: 52 by 47.9. Rutgers: 36 by 72.8. Southeast Missouri State: 24 by 66.7. Oregon State: 55 by 59.1. Fresno State: 30 by 75.7. Miami (OH): 43 by 57.2. South Florida: 30 by 48.7. West Virginia: 4 by 61.1. Illinois: 47 by 68. Pittsburgh: 48 by 45

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins263.1 · Games = 9 · +105.1 vs Losses
Losses158 · Games = 1 · -105.1 vs Wins