Usage Score
16.3
Player Dossier
2007-2009Cincinnati
QB • 6'6" • Cincinnati, OH, USA
Tony Pike is a balanced quarterback profile with 16.3 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
16.3
Efficiency
60.2
Consistency
74.8
Season Value
62.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2009 Postseason · Cincinnati
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tony Pike, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2009 Postseason · Cincinnati. Tony Pike is a balanced quarterback profile with 16.3 usage in the latest tracked season.
Tony Pike played QB for Cincinnati. Across 3 tracked seasons, Tony Pike recorded 5,018 passing yards, 128 rushing yards, and 52 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2009 with Cincinnati.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
Cincinnati paired 2,526 primary output with 60.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 60.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Fresno State
Win with 315 yards of offense and 75.7 efficiency. It landed in the 70th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
10
Primary Metric / G
252.6
Efficiency
60.2
Usage
16.3
Consistency
74.8
Best Game by takeover score
Fresno State
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Florida: 158. Rutgers: 369. Southeast Missouri State: 230. Oregon State: 347. Fresno State: 315. Miami (OH): 273. South Florida: 125. West Virginia: 16. Illinois: 402. Pittsburgh: 291
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida: 52 by 47.9. Rutgers: 36 by 72.8. Southeast Missouri State: 24 by 66.7. Oregon State: 55 by 59.1. Fresno State: 30 by 75.7. Miami (OH): 43 by 57.2. South Florida: 30 by 48.7. West Virginia: 4 by 61.1. Illinois: 47 by 68. Pittsburgh: 48 by 45
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Fresno State
Best efficiency game
75.7 vs Fresno State
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/2 | @ Florida3+ TD | L 24-51 | 27 | 45 | 170 | 60.0 | 3 | 0 | 47.9 | 7 | -12 | -1.70 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 12/5 | @ Pittsburgh300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 45-44 | 22 | 44 | 302 | 50.0 | 3 | 3 | 45 | 4 | -11 | -2.80 | 0 | 6 |
| Fri 11/27 | vs Illinois300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 49-36 | 32 | 46 | 399 | 69.6 | 6 | 0 | 68 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 11/14 | vs West Virginia | W 24-21 | 2 | 4 | 16 | 50.0 | 2 | 0 | 61.1 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Thu 10/15 | @ South Florida | W 34-17 | 12 | 25 | 140 | 48.0 | 2 | 0 | 48.7 | 5 | -15 | -3 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ Miami (OH) | W 37-13 | 23 | 42 | 270 | 54.8 | 2 | 1 | 57.2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs Fresno State300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 28-20 | 18 | 26 | 300 | 69.2 | 3 | 0 | 75.7 | 4 | 15 | 3.80 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/19 | @ Oregon State300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 28-18 | 31 | 49 | 332 | 63.3 | 2 | 1 | 59.1 | 6 | 15 | 2.50 | 1 | 9 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs Southeast Missouri State3+ TD | W 70-3 | 17 | 23 | 229 | 73.9 | 3 | 0 | 66.7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Mon 9/7 | @ Rutgers300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 47-15 | 27 | 34 | 362 | 79.4 | 3 | 1 | 72.8 | 2 | 7 | 3.50 | 0 | 16 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Cincinnati
2007-2009
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 166 | 47.8 | 7.2 | — |
| 2008 Postseason | Cincinnati | 2,454 | 56 | 15.6 | 2,288 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 2,454 | 56 | 15.6 | 0 |
| 2009 Postseason | Cincinnati | 2,526 | 60.2 | 16.3 | 72 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 2,526 | 60.2 | 16.3 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Pittsburgh
Win with 342 yards of offense and 74.6 efficiency.
342
Primary metric
342 total offense with 74.6 efficiency.
#2
Southeast Missouri State
124
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
124 total offense with 79.9 efficiency.
#3
Fresno State
315
Primary metric
Win with 315 yards of offense and 75.7 efficiency.
315 total offense with 75.7 efficiency.
#4
Miami (OH)
274
Primary metric
Win with 274 yards of offense and 83.3 efficiency.
274 total offense with 83.3 efficiency.
#5
Illinois
402
Primary metric
Win with 402 yards of offense and 68 efficiency.
402 total offense with 68 efficiency.
#1 Season by Season Value
2009 Postseason · Cincinnati
2,526 primary output · 60.2 efficiency · 16.3 usage
62.8
#2
2009 Regular Season · Cincinnati
62.8
2,526 primary · 60.2 efficiency · 16.3 usage
#3
2008 Postseason · Cincinnati
60.3
2,454 primary · 56 efficiency · 15.6 usage
11
250+ passing yards
6
300+ total offense
9
3+ TD games
11
Above avg efficiency
Recruit Profile
Class 2004 · Rating 0.7444
Stephenville · Stephenville, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
5,146
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 26 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.