Player Dossier

2007-2009

Cincinnati

Tony Pike

QB • 6'6" • Cincinnati, OH, USA

Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator

Tony Pike is a balanced quarterback profile with 16.3 usage in the latest tracked season.

Usage Score

16.3

Efficiency

60.2

Consistency

74.8

Season Value

62.8

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by Season Value: 2009 Postseason · Cincinnati

0708080909

Snapshot

Career Teams
1
Seasons Tracked
5
Program Path
Cincinnati
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Pittsburgh

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Tony Pike, QB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2009 Postseason · Cincinnati. Tony Pike is a balanced quarterback profile with 16.3 usage in the latest tracked season.

Tony Pike played QB for Cincinnati. Across 3 tracked seasons, Tony Pike recorded 5,018 passing yards, 128 rushing yards, and 52 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2009 with Cincinnati.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason

Cincinnati paired 2,526 primary output with 60.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2009 Postseason role shape

pass-led usage with 60.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Fresno State

Win with 315 yards of offense and 75.7 efficiency. It landed in the 70th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2009 Postseason · Cincinnati

Games

10

Primary Metric / G

252.6

Efficiency

60.2

Usage

16.3

Consistency

74.8

Best Game by takeover score

Fresno State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Florida: 158. Rutgers: 369. Southeast Missouri State: 230. Oregon State: 347. Fresno State: 315. Miami (OH): 273. South Florida: 125. West Virginia: 16. Illinois: 402. Pittsburgh: 291

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida: 52 by 47.9. Rutgers: 36 by 72.8. Southeast Missouri State: 24 by 66.7. Oregon State: 55 by 59.1. Fresno State: 30 by 75.7. Miami (OH): 43 by 57.2. South Florida: 30 by 48.7. West Virginia: 4 by 61.1. Illinois: 47 by 68. Pittsburgh: 48 by 45

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins263.1 · Games = 9 · +105.1 vs Losses
Losses158 · Games = 1 · -105.1 vs Wins

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

10 games

Featured metric

Total Offense

Top game by takeover score

Fresno State

Best efficiency game

75.7 vs Fresno State

Result
Sat 1/2@ Florida3+ TDL 24-51274517060.03047.97-12-1.7008
Sat 12/5@ Pittsburgh300-yard game · 3+ TDW 45-44224430250.033454-11-2.8006
Fri 11/27vs Illinois300-yard game · 3+ TDW 49-36324639969.6606813303
Sat 11/14vs West VirginiaW 24-21241650.02061.1
Thu 10/15@ South FloridaW 34-17122514048.02048.75-15-3012
Sat 10/3@ Miami (OH)W 37-13234227054.82157.213303
Sat 9/26vs Fresno State300-yard game · 3+ TDW 28-20182630069.23075.74153.80013
Sat 9/19@ Oregon State300-yard game · 3+ TDW 28-18314933263.32159.16152.5019
Sat 9/12vs Southeast Missouri State3+ TDW 70-3172322973.93066.711111
Mon 9/7@ Rutgers300-yard game · 3+ TDW 47-15273436279.43172.8273.50016

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Cincinnati

    2007-2009

    Opening stop

Season Value Progression

20072008200820092009
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2007 Regular SeasonCincinnati16647.87.2
2008 PostseasonCincinnati2,4545615.62,288
2008 Regular SeasonCincinnati2,4545615.60
2009 PostseasonCincinnati2,52660.216.372
2009 Regular SeasonCincinnati2,52660.216.30

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Pittsburgh

Win with 342 yards of offense and 74.6 efficiency.

342

Primary metric

342 total offense with 74.6 efficiency.

#2

Southeast Missouri State

124

Primary metric

Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.

124 total offense with 79.9 efficiency.

#3

Fresno State

315

Primary metric

Win with 315 yards of offense and 75.7 efficiency.

315 total offense with 75.7 efficiency.

#4

Miami (OH)

274

Primary metric

Win with 274 yards of offense and 83.3 efficiency.

274 total offense with 83.3 efficiency.

#5

Illinois

402

Primary metric

Win with 402 yards of offense and 68 efficiency.

402 total offense with 68 efficiency.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by Season Value

2009 Postseason · Cincinnati

2,526 primary output · 60.2 efficiency · 16.3 usage

62.8

#2

2009 Regular Season · Cincinnati

62.8

2,526 primary · 60.2 efficiency · 16.3 usage

#3

2008 Postseason · Cincinnati

60.3

2,454 primary · 56 efficiency · 15.6 usage

Milestones

11

250+ passing yards

6

300+ total offense

9

3+ TD games

11

Above avg efficiency

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

2★

Class 2004 · Rating 0.7444

Stephenville · Stephenville, TX

Committed To
Missouri
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2004

Career Facts

1

Career teams

5

Seasons tracked

5,146

Career Total Offense

Data Context

Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 26 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.