Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2005-2008Northwestern
—
Rasheed Ward shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Usage Score
—
Efficiency
—
Consistency
7.7
Season Value
53.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2006 Regular Season · Northwestern
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Rasheed Ward, player. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2006 Regular Season · Northwestern. Rasheed Ward shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Rasheed Ward is listed for Northwestern. Detailed college production data is limited on CFB Track.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2006 Regular Season
Northwestern paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2008 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2008 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Missouri
Loss with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Primary Metric / G
0.2
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
7.7
Best Game by takeover score
Missouri
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Missouri: 1. Syracuse: 0. Duke: 0. Southern Illinois: 0. Ohio: 0. Iowa: 1. Michigan State: 1. Purdue: 0. Indiana: 0. Minnesota: 0. Ohio State: 0. Michigan: 0. Illinois: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Missouri
Best efficiency game
— vs Missouri
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 12/30 | vs Missouri | L 23-30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Illinois | W 27-10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/15 | @ Michigan | W 21-14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/8 | vs Ohio State | L 10-45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Minnesota | W 24-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/25 | @ Indiana | L 19-21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Purdue | W 48-26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Michigan State | L 20-37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Iowa | W 22-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Ohio | W 16-8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Southern Illinois | W 33-7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | @ Duke | W 24-20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Syracuse | W 30-10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Northwestern
2005-2008
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 Regular Season | Northwestern | 1 | — | — | — |
| 2006 Regular Season | Northwestern | 0 | — | — | -1 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Northwestern | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Northwestern | 3 | — | — | 3 |
#1 Featured game
Arizona State
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1
Primary metric
1 primary-metric impact.
#2
Missouri
1
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#3
Michigan State
1
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#4
Iowa
1
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#5
Ohio
0
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
0 primary-metric impact.
#1 Season by Season Value
2006 Regular Season · Northwestern
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2007 Regular Season · Northwestern
100
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2008 Regular Season · Northwestern
53.9
3 primary · — efficiency · — usage
4
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2004 · Rating 0.7667
Mesa Verde · Citrus Heights, CA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 35 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.