Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2006 Regular Season
Wake Forest paired 24 primary output with 100 efficiency.
Player Stats
Brett Hodges College Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Career production snapshot
- Total offense
- 2,809
- Passing yards
- 2,840
- Touchdowns
- 20
Season Ledger
Crawlable season-by-season stats
| Season | Team | Games | Total Offense | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 1 | 24 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 67 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 6 | 346 | 359 | -13 | 2 | 33.9 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 1 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 59.1 |
| 2009 Postseason | UCF | 12 | 147 | 175 | -28 | 2 | 66 |
| 2009 Regular Season | UCF | 12 | 2,273 | 2,263 | 10 | 16 | 66 |
Player insights
Supporting note
2009 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 55.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Wake Forest, UCF.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Buffalo
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 50th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Postseason · UCF
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
201.7
Efficiency
55.5
Usage
14.4
Consistency
76.6
Best Game by takeover score
Buffalo
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Rutgers: 147. Samford: 133. Southern Miss: 137. Buffalo: 212. East Carolina: 245. Memphis: 233. Miami: 145. Rice: 153. Marshall: 333. Houston: 220. Tulane: 230. UAB: 232
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Rutgers: 33 by 42.5. Samford: 19 by 54.6. Southern Miss: 30 by 52.1. Buffalo: 33 by 72.1. East Carolina: 39 by 45. Memphis: 31 by 67.5. Miami: 30 by 45. Rice: 22 by 65.8. Marshall: 50 by 53.6. Houston: 29 by 62.1. Tulane: 31 by 55.8. UAB: 41 by 49.8
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins218.3 · Games = 8 · +49.8 vs Losses
Losses168.5 · Games = 4 · -49.8 vs Wins
Next best actions
Keep exploring Brett Hodges
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.