Usage Score
14.4
Player Dossier
2006-2009UCF
QB • 6'1" • Winter Springs, FL, USA
Brett Hodges is a balanced quarterback profile with 14.4 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
14.4
Efficiency
55.5
Consistency
76.6
Season Value
61.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2006 Regular Season · Wake Forest
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Brett Hodges, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2006 Regular Season · Wake Forest. Brett Hodges is a balanced quarterback profile with 14.4 usage in the latest tracked season.
Brett Hodges played QB for Wake Forest and UCF. Across 4 tracked seasons, Brett Hodges recorded 2,840 passing yards, -31 rushing yards, and 20 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2009 with UCF.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2006 Regular Season
Wake Forest paired 24 primary output with 100 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 55.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Wake Forest, UCF.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Marshall
Win with 333 yards of offense and 53.6 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
201.7
Efficiency
55.5
Usage
14.4
Consistency
76.6
Best Game by takeover score
Rutgers
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Rutgers: 147. Unknown: 133. Southern Miss: 137. Buffalo: 212. East Carolina: 245. Memphis: 233. Miami: 145. Rice: 153. Marshall: 333. Houston: 220. Tulane: 230. UAB: 232
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Rutgers: 33 by 42.5. Unknown: 19 by 54.6. Southern Miss: 30 by 52.1. Buffalo: 33 by 72.1. East Carolina: 39 by 45. Memphis: 31 by 67.5. Miami: 30 by 45. Rice: 22 by 65.8. Marshall: 50 by 53.6. Houston: 29 by 62.1. Tulane: 31 by 55.8. UAB: 41 by 49.8
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Marshall
Best efficiency game
72.1 vs Buffalo
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/20 | @ Rutgers | L 24-45 | 13 | 28 | 175 | 46.4 | 2 | 2 | 42.5 | 5 | -28 | -5.60 | 0 | 1 |
| Sat 11/28 | @ UAB | W 34-27 | 24 | 38 | 230 | 63.2 | 2 | 2 | 49.8 | 3 | 2 | 0.70 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 11/21 | vs Tulane | W 49-0 | 19 | 28 | 234 | 67.9 | 2 | 1 | 55.8 | 3 | -4 | -1.30 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 11/14 | vs Houston | W 37-32 | 21 | 25 | 241 | 84.0 | 1 | 1 | 62.1 | 4 | -21 | -5.30 | 0 | 0 |
| Mon 11/2 | vs Marshall300-yard game | W 21-20 | 23 | 45 | 342 | 51.1 | 2 | 0 | 53.6 | 5 | -9 | -1.80 | 0 | 1 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Rice | W 49-7 | 8 | 13 | 145 | 61.5 | 1 | 0 | 65.8 | 9 | 8 | 0.90 | 1 | 12 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs Miami | L 7-27 | 12 | 27 | 163 | 44.4 | 1 | 1 | 45 | 3 | -18 | -6 | 0 | 2 |
| Sat 10/3 | vs Memphis | W 32-14 | 16 | 28 | 214 | 57.1 | 2 | 1 | 67.5 | 3 | 19 | 6.30 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/26 | @ East Carolina | L 14-19 | 21 | 34 | 266 | 61.8 | 1 | 4 | 45 | 5 | -21 | -4.20 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs BuffaloDual-threat | W 23-17 | 15 | 20 | 141 | 75.0 | 0 | 0 | 72.1 | 13 | 71 | 5.50 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/12 | @ Southern Miss | L 19-26 | 15 | 26 | 158 | 57.7 | 2 | 0 | 52.1 | 4 | -21 | -5.30 | 0 | 1 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Unknown | — | 10 | 17 | 129 | 58.8 | 1 | 1 | 54.6 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Wake Forest
2006-2008
Opening stop
UCF
2009
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 24 | 100 | — | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 346 | 62.8 | 12.8 | 322 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Wake Forest | 19 | 76.4 | — | -327 |
| 2009 Postseason | UCF | 2,420 | 55.5 | 14.4 | 2,401 |
| 2009 Regular Season | UCF | 2,420 | 55.5 | 14.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with 24 yards of offense and 100 efficiency.
24
Primary metric
24 total offense with 100 efficiency.
#2
Maryland
19
Primary metric
Loss with 19 yards of offense and 76.4 efficiency.
19 total offense with 76.4 efficiency.
#3
Marshall
333
Primary metric
Win with 333 yards of offense and 53.6 efficiency.
333 total offense with 53.6 efficiency.
#4
Buffalo
212
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
212 total offense with 72.1 efficiency.
#5
Nebraska
154
Primary metric
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
154 total offense with 45.7 efficiency.
#1 Season by value score
2006 Regular Season · Wake Forest
24 primary output · 100 efficiency · — usage
67
#2
2009 Postseason · UCF
61.6
2,420 primary · 55.5 efficiency · 14.4 usage
#3
2009 Regular Season · UCF
61.6
2,420 primary · 55.5 efficiency · 14.4 usage
1
250+ passing yards
1
300+ total offense
2
3+ takeover TD games
9
Above avg efficiency
Recruit Profile
Class 2004 · Rating 0.7667
Leuzinger · Lawndale, CA
Career Facts
2
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
2,809
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 20 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.