Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2004-2006Notre Dame
Jeff Samardzija
—
Impact contributor
Jeff Samardzija shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Efficiency
—
Consistency
76.4
Season Value
81.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2004 Regular Season · Notre Dame
040506
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- Notre Dame
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Michigan State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jeff Samardzija, player. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2004 Regular Season · Notre Dame. Jeff Samardzija shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Jeff Samardzija is listed for Notre Dame. Detailed college production data is limited on CFB Track.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2004 Regular Season
Notre Dame paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2006 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2006 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UCLA
Win with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2006 Regular Season · Notre Dame
Games
13
Primary Metric / G
1
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
76.4
Best Game by takeover score
UCLA
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. LSU: 1. Georgia Tech: 0. Penn State: 1. Michigan: 1. Michigan State: 2. Purdue: 1. Stanford: 1. UCLA: 2. Navy: 0. North Carolina: 1. Air Force: 1. Army: 1. USC: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins1 · Games = 10 · +0 vs Losses
Losses1 · Games = 3 · +0 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
UCLA
Best efficiency game
— vs LSU
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 1/4 | @ LSU | L 14-41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sun 11/26 | @ USC | L 24-44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 0.50 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 11/18 | vs Army | W 41-9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/11 | @ Air Force | W 39-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | vs North Carolina | W 45-26 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | @ Navy | W 38-14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | vs UCLA | W 20-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | vs Stanford | W 31-10 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Purdue | W 35-21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 5 |
| Sun 9/24 | @ Michigan State | W 40-37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Michigan | L 21-47 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Penn State | W 41-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 9/3 | @ Georgia Tech | W 14-10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Notre Dame
2004-2006
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
200420052006
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2005 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 15 | — | — | 15 |
| 2006 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 13 | — | — | -2 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Michigan State
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
3
Primary metric
3 primary-metric impact.
#2
UCLA
2
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#3
Michigan State
2
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#4
Stanford
2
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#5
BYU
2
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2004 Regular Season · Notre Dame
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2005 Regular Season · Notre Dame
82.9
15 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2006 Regular Season · Notre Dame
81.5
13 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
6
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2012 · Rating 0.8253
Lansing Catholic · Lansing, MI
- Committed To
- Central Michigan
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2012
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 31 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring Jeff Samardzija
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.