Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2004-2005Colorado
—
Joel Klatt shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Usage Score
—
Efficiency
—
Consistency
48
Season Value
74
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2005 Regular Season · Colorado
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Joel Klatt, player. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2005 Regular Season · Colorado. Joel Klatt shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Joel Klatt is listed for Colorado. Detailed college production data is limited on CFB Track.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season
Colorado paired 14 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2005 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2005 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kansas
Win with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
1.2
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
48
Best Game by takeover score
Kansas
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Colorado State: 0. New Mexico State: 2. Miami: 0. Oklahoma State: 1. Texas A&M: 3. Texas: 2. Kansas: 4. Kansas State: 1. Missouri: 1. Iowa State: 0. Nebraska: 0. Texas: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Kansas
Best efficiency game
— vs Texas
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/3 | vs Texas | L 3-70 | 14 | 24 | 100 | 58.3 | 0 | 1 | — | 4 | 26 | 6.50 | 0 | 16 |
| Fri 11/25 | vs Nebraska | L 3-30 | 20 | 40 | 159 | 50.0 | 0 | 1 | — | 7 | -30 | -4.30 | 0 | 2 |
| Sun 11/13 | @ Iowa State | L 16-30 | 25 | 42 | 284 | 59.5 | 0 | 2 | — | 4 | -9 | -2.30 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Missouri | W 41-12 | 23 | 31 | 253 | 74.2 | 1 | 0 | — | 3 | -8 | -2.70 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Kansas State | W 23-20 | 17 | 34 | 272 | 50.0 | 1 | 0 | — | 6 | -15 | -2.50 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Kansas | W 44-13 | 16 | 27 | 193 | 59.3 | 4 | 0 | — | 8 | -7 | -0.90 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Texas | L 17-42 | 19 | 39 | 189 | 48.7 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Texas A&M | W 41-20 | 28 | 36 | 398 | 77.8 | 3 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Oklahoma State | W 34-0 | 14 | 26 | 151 | 53.8 | 1 | 0 | — | 4 | 26 | 6.50 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Miami | L 3-23 | 25 | 43 | 228 | 58.1 | 0 | 2 | — | 5 | -19 | -3.80 | 0 | 4 |
| Sun 9/11 | vs New Mexico State | W 39-0 | 18 | 25 | 186 | 72.0 | 2 | 0 | — | 6 | 33 | 5.50 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Colorado State | W 31-28 | 22 | 33 | 283 | 66.7 | 0 | 1 | — | 7 | -7 | -1 | 0 | 14 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Colorado
2004-2005
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 Regular Season | Colorado | 10 | — | — | — |
| 2005 Regular Season | Colorado | 14 | — | — | 4 |
#1 Featured game
North Texas
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
3
Primary metric
3 primary-metric impact.
#2
Kansas
4
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
4 primary-metric impact.
#3
Texas A&M
3
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
3 primary-metric impact.
#4
UTEP
2
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#5
Texas A&M
2
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#1 Season by Season Value
2005 Regular Season · Colorado
14 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
74
#2
2004 Regular Season · Colorado
54.1
10 primary · — efficiency · — usage
5
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2014 · Rating 0.7733
Grants · Grants, NM
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 24 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.