Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2004-2006Texas A&M
Chad Schroeder
—
Impact contributor
Chad Schroeder shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Efficiency
—
Consistency
10.3
Season Value
38.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2005 Regular Season · Texas A&M
040506
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- Texas A&M
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Oklahoma
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Chad Schroeder, player. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2005 Regular Season · Texas A&M. Chad Schroeder shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Chad Schroeder is listed for Texas A&M. Detailed college production data is limited on CFB Track.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season
Texas A&M paired 6 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2006 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2006 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: California
Loss with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2006 Regular Season · Texas A&M
Games
13
Primary Metric / G
0.3
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
10.3
Best Game by takeover score
California
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. California: 1. The Citadel: 1. Louisiana: 1. Army: 1. Louisiana Tech: 0. Texas Tech: 0. Kansas: 0. Missouri: 0. Oklahoma State: 0. Baylor: 0. Oklahoma: 0. Nebraska: 0. Texas: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0.3 · Games = 9 · +0.1 vs Losses
Losses0.3 · Games = 4 · -0.1 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
California
Best efficiency game
— vs California
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/29 | @ California | L 10-45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | -11 | -11 | 0 | 0 |
| Fri 11/24 | @ Texas | W 12-7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/11 | vs Nebraska | L 27-28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 11/5 | vs Oklahoma | L 16-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | -8 | -8 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 10/28 | @ Baylor | W 31-21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | @ Oklahoma State | W 34-33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | vs Missouri | W 25-19 | 1 | 1 | 40 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | @ Kansas | W 21-18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Texas Tech | L 27-31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | vs Louisiana Tech | W 45-14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 9/17 | vs Army | W 28-24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Louisiana | W 51-7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/2 | vs The Citadel | W 35-3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas A&M
2004-2006
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
200420052006
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 3 | — | — | — |
| 2005 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 6 | — | — | 3 |
| 2006 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 4 | — | — | -2 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Oklahoma
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
2
Primary metric
2 primary-metric impact.
#2
Texas State
2
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#3
SMU
2
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#4
California
1
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#5
Army
1
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2005 Regular Season · Texas A&M
6 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
69.5
#2
2004 Regular Season · Texas A&M
44.5
3 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2006 Regular Season · Texas A&M
38.5
4 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
7
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2015 · Rating 0.903
Rockbridge County · Lexington, VA
- Committed To
- Virginia Tech
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2015
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 25 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring Chad Schroeder
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.