Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2004-2006Clemson
—
Will Proctor shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Usage Score
—
Efficiency
—
Consistency
58.1
Season Value
79.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2004 Regular Season · Clemson
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Will Proctor, player. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2004 Regular Season · Clemson. Will Proctor shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Will Proctor is listed for Clemson. Detailed college production data is limited on CFB Track.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2004 Regular Season
Clemson paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2006 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2006 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kentucky
Loss with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
1.3
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
58.1
Best Game by takeover score
Kentucky
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Kentucky: 3. Florida Atlantic: 3. Boston College: 2. Florida State: 2. North Carolina: 0. Louisiana Tech: 1. Wake Forest: 1. Georgia Tech: 1. Virginia Tech: 0. Maryland: 0. NC State: 1. South Carolina: 1
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Kentucky
Best efficiency game
— vs Kentucky
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/29 | @ Kentucky | L 20-28 | 23 | 39 | 272 | 59.0 | 3 | 1 | — | 9 | 32 | 3.60 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 11/25 | vs South Carolina | L 28-31 | 13 | 19 | 191 | 68.4 | 1 | 1 | — | 6 | -25 | -4.20 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 11/11 | vs NC State | W 20-14 | 15 | 24 | 146 | 62.5 | 1 | 2 | — | 6 | 21 | 3.50 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 11/4 | vs Maryland | L 12-13 | 18 | 27 | 251 | 66.7 | 0 | 0 | — | 9 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Thu 10/26 | @ Virginia Tech | L 7-24 | 11 | 28 | 86 | 39.3 | 0 | 1 | — | 5 | 7 | 1.40 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 10/21 | vs Georgia Tech | W 31-7 | 7 | 16 | 105 | 43.8 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | -11 | -11 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 10/7 | @ Wake Forest | W 27-17 | 20 | 30 | 214 | 66.7 | 1 | 3 | — | 3 | 2 | 0.70 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Louisiana Tech | W 51-0 | 5 | 8 | 100 | 62.5 | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | -3 | -3 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 9/23 | vs North Carolina | W 52-7 | 9 | 14 | 134 | 64.3 | 0 | 1 | — | 5 | 30 | 6 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Florida State | W 27-20 | 16 | 30 | 194 | 53.3 | 1 | 0 | — | 2 | 15 | 7.50 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 9/9 | @ Boston College | L 33-34 | 25 | 40 | 343 | 62.5 | 2 | 0 | — | 7 | -3 | -0.40 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Florida Atlantic | W 54-6 | 13 | 20 | 166 | 65.0 | 3 | 1 | — | 6 | 3 | 0.50 | 0 | 5 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Clemson
2004-2006
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 Regular Season | Clemson | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2005 Regular Season | Clemson | 4 | — | — | 4 |
| 2006 Regular Season | Clemson | 15 | — | — | 11 |
#1 Featured game
Duke
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
3
Primary metric
3 primary-metric impact.
#2
Kentucky
3
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
3 primary-metric impact.
#3
Florida Atlantic
3
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
3 primary-metric impact.
#4
Florida State
2
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#5
Boston College
2
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#1 Season by Season Value
2004 Regular Season · Clemson
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2006 Regular Season · Clemson
79.1
15 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2005 Regular Season · Clemson
32.5
4 primary · — efficiency · — usage
5
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2016 · Rating 0.8275
Coppell · Coppell, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 17 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.