Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2004-2006Tulane
—
Lester Ricard shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Usage Score
—
Efficiency
—
Consistency
33.3
Season Value
59.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2004 Regular Season · Tulane
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Lester Ricard, player. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2004 Regular Season · Tulane. Lester Ricard shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Lester Ricard is listed for Tulane. Detailed college production data is limited on CFB Track.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2004 Regular Season
Tulane paired 21 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2006 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2006 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Rice
Win with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
1.5
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
33.3
Best Game by takeover score
Rice
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Houston: 1. Mississippi State: 4. LSU: 0. SMU: 3. Rice: 4. UTEP: 0. Auburn: 1. Army: 3. Marshall: 1. Southern Miss: 0. UCF: 1. Tulsa: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Rice
Best efficiency game
— vs Tulsa
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/24 | @ Tulsa | L 3-38 | 10 | 21 | 78 | 47.6 | 0 | 0 | — | 4 | -18 | -4.50 | 0 | 2 |
| Sat 11/18 | vs UCF | W 10-9 | 26 | 43 | 267 | 60.5 | 1 | 2 | — | 11 | 4 | 0.40 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 11/11 | vs Southern Miss | L 3-31 | 1 | 8 | 12 | 12.5 | 0 | 1 | — | 4 | -19 | -4.80 | 0 | 7 |
| Sun 11/5 | @ Marshall | L 21-42 | 26 | 46 | 262 | 56.5 | 1 | 2 | — | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/28 | vs Army | W 42-28 | 33 | 43 | 409 | 76.7 | 3 | 0 | — | 5 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/21 | @ Auburn | L 13-38 | 20 | 39 | 283 | 51.3 | 1 | 1 | — | 5 | -13 | -2.60 | 0 | 7 |
| Sun 10/15 | @ UTEP | L 20-34 | 27 | 49 | 248 | 55.1 | 0 | 2 | — | 5 | 35 | 7 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/7 | vs Rice | W 38-24 | 21 | 40 | 344 | 52.5 | 4 | 1 | — | 6 | -16 | -2.70 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/30 | vs SMU | L 28-33 | 29 | 48 | 394 | 60.4 | 3 | 0 | — | 6 | -51 | -8.50 | 0 | 0 |
| Sun 9/24 | @ LSU | L 7-49 | 6 | 15 | 44 | 40.0 | 0 | 0 | — | 3 | -13 | -4.30 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Mississippi State | W 32-29 | 16 | 23 | 298 | 69.6 | 4 | 0 | — | 4 | -30 | -7.50 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 9/9 | @ Houston | L 7-45 | 14 | 25 | 156 | 56.0 | 1 | 1 | — | 5 | -3 | -0.60 | 0 | 9 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Tulane
2004-2006
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 Regular Season | Tulane | 21 | — | — | — |
| 2005 Regular Season | Tulane | 16 | — | — | -5 |
| 2006 Regular Season | Tulane | 18 | — | — | 2 |
#1 Featured game
UAB
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
6
Primary metric
6 primary-metric impact.
#2
UCF
3
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
3 primary-metric impact.
#3
UTEP
3
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
3 primary-metric impact.
#4
Rice
4
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
4 primary-metric impact.
#5
Mississippi State
4
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
4 primary-metric impact.
#1 Season by Season Value
2004 Regular Season · Tulane
21 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
79.9
#2
2005 Regular Season · Tulane
69.2
16 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2006 Regular Season · Tulane
59.5
18 primary · — efficiency · — usage
11
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2017 · Rating 0.7583
Abingdon · Abingdon, VA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 31 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.