Player Dossier

2004-2006

Michigan State

Drew Stanton

—

Impact contributor

Drew Stanton shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.

Usage Score

—

Efficiency

—

Consistency

34.7

Season Value

54.3

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by Season Value: 2005 Regular Season · Michigan State

040506

Snapshot

Career Teams: 1
Seasons Tracked: 3
Program Path: Michigan State
Peak Game: Peak game by takeover score: Illinois

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Drew Stanton is listed for Michigan State. Detailed college production data is limited on CFB Track.

Back to Teams Jump to Game Log

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season

Michigan State paired 23 primary output with — efficiency.

Supporting note

2006 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with — efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2006 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Eastern Michigan

Win with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Career Metric

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2006 Regular Season · Michigan State

SeasonCategoryMetricSplit

SortDirection

Games

Primary Metric / G

1.5

Efficiency

—

Usage

—

Consistency

34.7

Best Game by takeover score

Eastern Michigan

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

Chronological game order.

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins3 · Games = 4 · +2.3 vs Losses

Losses0.7 · Games = 7 · -2.3 vs Wins

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

11 games

SeasonCategoryMetricSortDirection

Featured metric

Touchdowns

Top game by takeover score

Eastern Michigan

Best efficiency game

— vs Minnesota

		Result
Sat 11/11	vs Minnesota	L 18-31	2	2	11	100.0	0	0	—	4	-5	-1.30	0	4
Sat 11/4	vs Purdue	L 15-17	16	29	161	55.2	1	1	—	13	83	6.40	0	15
Sat 10/28	@ Indiana	L 21-46	10	22	100	45.5	1	1	—	8	34	4.30	0	14
Sat 10/21	@ Northwestern	W 41-38	27	37	294	73.0	2	1	—	9	37	4.10	1	14
Sat 10/14	vs Ohio State	L 7-38	8	16	54	50.0	0	1	—	7	-6	-0.90	0	8
Sat 10/7	@ Michigan	L 13-31	20	35	252	57.1	0	2	—	7	24	3.40	1	9
Sat 9/30	vs Illinois	L 20-23	15	24	144	62.5	0	0	—	13	32	2.50	0	21
Sun 9/24	vs Notre Dame	L 37-40	10	22	114	45.5	2	2	—	19	53	2.80	0	37
Sat 9/16	@ Pittsburgh	W 38-23	16	25	198	64.0	2	1	—	13	105	8.10	1	21
Sat 9/9	vs Eastern Michigan	W 52-20	24	32	254	75.0	3	1	—	9	33	3.70	2	11
Sat 9/2	vs Idaho	W 27-17	16	25	225	64.0	1	0	—	8	55	6.90	0	17

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

1
Michigan State
2004-2006
Opening stop

Season Value Progression

200420052006

Season	Team	Primary	Efficiency	Usage	Delta
2004 Regular Season	Michigan State	14	—	—	—
2005 Regular Season	Michigan State	23	—	—	9
2006 Regular Season	Michigan State	17	—	—	-6