Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2004-2005Texas A&M
Jason Carter
—
Impact contributor
Jason Carter shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Efficiency
—
Consistency
15.2
Season Value
57.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2005 Regular Season · Texas A&M
0405
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 2
- Program Path
- Texas A&M
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Baylor
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jason Carter, player. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2005 Regular Season · Texas A&M. Jason Carter shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Jason Carter is listed for Texas A&M. Detailed college production data is limited on CFB Track.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season
Texas A&M paired 6 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2005 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2005 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: SMU
Win with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2005 Regular Season · Texas A&M
Games
11
Primary Metric / G
0.5
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
15.2
Best Game by takeover score
SMU
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Clemson: 0. SMU: 2. Texas State: 1. Baylor: 0. Colorado: 1. Oklahoma State: 0. Kansas State: 0. Iowa State: 1. Texas Tech: 0. Oklahoma: 0. Texas: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0.6 · Games = 5 · +0.1 vs Losses
Losses0.5 · Games = 6 · -0.1 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
SMU
Best efficiency game
— vs Texas
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/25 | vs Texas | L 29-40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Oklahoma | L 30-36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 30 | 10 | 0 | 23 |
| Sun 11/6 | @ Texas Tech | L 17-56 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Iowa State | L 14-42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Kansas State | W 30-28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Oklahoma State | W 62-23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Colorado | L 20-41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Baylor | W 16-13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 7 | 2.30 | 0 | 8 |
| Fri 9/23 | vs Texas State | W 44-31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs SMU | W 66-8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 8 |
| Sun 9/4 | @ Clemson | L 24-25 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | — | 4 | 27 | 6.80 | 0 | 19 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas A&M
2004-2005
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
20042005
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 4 | — | — | — |
| 2005 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 6 | — | — | 2 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Baylor
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1
Primary metric
1 primary-metric impact.
#2
Kansas State
1
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#3
Clemson
1
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#4
Utah
1
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#5
SMU
2
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2005 Regular Season · Texas A&M
6 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
57.6
#2
2004 Regular Season · Texas A&M
38.9
4 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
5
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2020 · Rating 0.83
Berkeley Prep · Tampa, FL
- Committed To
- Maryland
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2020
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 23 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring Jason Carter
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.