Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2004-2005Purdue
Jerod Void
—
Impact contributor
Jerod Void shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Efficiency
—
Consistency
53.3
Season Value
76.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2005 Regular Season · Purdue
0405
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 2
- Program Path
- Purdue
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Michigan
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jerod Void, player. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2005 Regular Season · Purdue. Jerod Void shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Jerod Void is listed for Purdue. Detailed college production data is limited on CFB Track.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season
Purdue paired 10 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2005 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2005 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Michigan State
Win with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2005 Regular Season · Purdue
Games
10
Primary Metric / G
1
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
53.3
Best Game by takeover score
Michigan State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Akron: 1. Arizona: 3. Minnesota: 1. Notre Dame: 0. Northwestern: 1. Wisconsin: 0. Penn State: 0. Michigan State: 3. Illinois: 1. Indiana: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins1.6 · Games = 5 · +1.2 vs Losses
Losses0.4 · Games = 5 · -1.2 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Michigan State
Best efficiency game
— vs Indiana
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/19 | @ Indiana | W 41-14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 10 | 55 | 5.50 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Illinois | W 37-3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 24 | 102 | 4.30 | 1 | 21 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Michigan State | W 28-21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 24 | 134 | 5.60 | 3 | 64 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Penn State | L 15-33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 10 | 57 | 5.70 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Wisconsin | L 20-31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 13 | 54 | 4.20 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Northwestern | L 29-34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7 | 37 | 5.30 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Notre Dame | L 28-49 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6 | 23 | 3.80 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Minnesota | L 35-42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 8 | 26 | 3.30 | 1 | 8 |
| Sun 9/18 | @ Arizona | W 31-24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 18 | 107 | 5.90 | 3 | 55 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Akron | W 49-24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 10 | 101 | 10.10 | 1 | 46 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Purdue
2004-2005
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
20042005
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 Regular Season | Purdue | 3 | — | — | — |
| 2005 Regular Season | Purdue | 10 | — | — | 7 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Michigan
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1
Primary metric
1 primary-metric impact.
#2
Ball State
1
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#3
Syracuse
1
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#4
Michigan State
3
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
3 primary-metric impact.
#5
Arizona
3
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
3 primary-metric impact.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2005 Regular Season · Purdue
10 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
76.7
#2
2004 Regular Season · Purdue
19.2
3 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
5
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2020 · Rating 0.8585
Irwin County · Ocilla, GA
- Committed To
- —
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2020
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 22 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Next best actions
Keep exploring Jerod Void
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.