Top 25
5-7
- Games
- 12
- Win rate
- 41.7%
Back to Coaches
Consistent WinnerBalanced
Coach Profile
Mike Elko
2022-2025 • Duke, Texas A&M
2 schools coached, anchored by Texas A&M.
Mike Elko coached 4 seasons, won 63.2%, and posted an average SRS of 11.4. Best season: 2025 Texas A&M. The profile was balanced with a very steady week-to-week shape. 2 stints shaped the career arc.
- Career record
- 24-14
- Career win rate
- 63.2%
- Average SRS
- 11.4
- Peak SRS
- 16.6
Career Dossier
One glance at the full arc.
The profile below keeps the headline numbers visible, then moves into tenure shape, school impact, and full season detail.
- Seasons coached
- 4
- Career span
- 4 years
- Best finish
- —
- Consistency
- 88.5
Primary school anchor
Texas A&M
Balanced profile with 2 program stops and a peak score of 77.2.
Career Arc
Track how the coach's season-to-season performance changed over time, where the peak landed, and where each school stint appears.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Mike Elko
EliteStrongAverageLean
Mike Elko: 2024 Texas A&M
2022Actual season year • SRS range 7.0 to 16.62025
Active comparison point
Mike Elko • 2025
2025 Texas A&M
Best seasonBiggest improvement0-0 • SRS 16.6 • SP Overall 20.7
Win %
—
YoY SRS
+4.4
SP Off / Def
38.0 / 16.4
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Focus a point to inspect how it stacks up against the rest of the field.
Ranked opponent record
Track career record against ranked opponents with switchable poll source and ranking timing.
Using AP Top 25 rankings at the time of each game; week-one games use the week-one ranking release when available.
Top 10
3-3
- Games
- 6
- Win rate
- 50.0%
Top 5
0-3
- Games
- 3
- Win rate
- 0.0%
View ranked game results12
Tenure map
Each stint expands by seasons coached. Deeper color signals a stronger average SRS over that stretch.
Length = seasons coachedDeeper color = stronger stint
Texas A&M
2024-2025 • 2 seasons
Avg SRS 14.4 • Win % 61.5%
Duke
2022-2023 • 2 seasons
Avg SRS 8.4 • Win % 64.0%
- Longest tenure
- Texas A&M • 2 seasons
- Best tenure
- Texas A&M • 14.4 SRS
- Best tenure win rate
- Duke • 64.0%
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Mike Elko sets the reference point in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeMike Elko sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Mike Elko
Elite
- Raw avg SP Overall
- 13.0
- Percentile
- 92th pct
Elite
Normalized against the full tracked coach pool.
Impact by school
See how each stint compared with what that program usually looked like outside that same span.
Texas A&M
2024-2025 • 8-5
Compared with this school's baseline outside that stint over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg SRS 14.4Win % 61.5%
Avg wins
Higher is better
4.0 during vs 6.7 baseline
-2.7
Avg SRS
Higher is better
14.4 during vs 10.7 baseline
+3.7
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
18.9 during vs 15.4 baseline
+3.5
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
0.0% during vs 20.0% baseline
-20.0%
Duke
2022-2023 • 16-9
Compared with this school's baseline outside that stint over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg SRS 8.4Win % 64.0%
Avg wins
Higher is better
8.0 during vs 5.0 baseline
+3.0
Avg SRS
Higher is better
8.4 during vs -0.8 baseline
+9.2
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
7.2 during vs -1.1 baseline
+8.3
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
0.0% during vs 0.0% baseline
+0.0%
Career highs and lows
High Points
Best Season
Texas A&M 2025
0-0 • SRS 16.6
Biggest Improvement
Texas A&M 2025
0-0 • 4.4 SRS
Best Offensive Season
Texas A&M 2025
0-0 • SP Off 38.0
Best Defensive Season
Texas A&M 2025
0-0 • SP Def 16.4
Setbacks
Worst Season
Duke 2022
9-4 • SRS 7.0
Biggest Drop
Texas A&M 2024
8-5 • 2.4 SRS
Season-by-season results
Full transparency into every season in the coaching record. Positive YoY values indicate improvement from the prior season.
| Texas A&M | 2025 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | 16.6 | 20.7 | 38.0 | 16.4 | +4.4 | — |
| Texas A&M | 2024 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 61.5% | #20 | — | 12.2 | 17.0 | 34.0 | 18.6 | +2.4 | +3.2% |
| Duke | 2023 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 58.3% | — | — | 9.8 | 9.4 | 27.3 | 19.5 | +2.8 | -10.9% |
| Duke | 2022 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 69.2% | — | — | 7.0 | 5.0 | 29.4 | 24.7 | — | — |
Similar coaches
Related profiles are matched by style, strength band, volatility band, peak range, and career length.
Chalmer Woodward
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 1.2
Avg SRS 10.2 • Peak SRS 13.1 • 4 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 3.5
Open profile →Dick Vermeil
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.7
Avg SRS 12.1 • Peak SRS 15.6 • 2 seasons
Best finish #5 • Volatility 3.5
Open profile →Brent Venables
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.8
Avg SRS 12.3 • Peak SRS 19.1 • 4 seasons
Best finish #15 • Volatility 4.4
Open profile →HN Russell
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 1.9
Avg SRS 13.3 • Peak SRS 17.4 • 3 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 3.5
Open profile →Edgar Holt
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.0
Avg SRS 11.4 • Peak SRS 16.4 • 2 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 5.0
Open profile →Ray George
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 1.9
Avg SRS 9.5 • Peak SRS 14.3 • 3 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 3.4
Open profile →