Top 25
5-3
- Games
- 8
- Win rate
- 62.5%
Coach Profile
2022-2025 • Duke, Texas A&M
2 schools coached, anchored by Texas A&M.
Mike Elko's coaching record is 35-16, highlighted by seasons at Texas A&M from 2022 to 2025.
Mike Elko coached 4 seasons, won 68.6%, and posted an average SRS of 11.4. Best season: 2025 Texas A&M. The profile was balanced with a very steady week-to-week shape. 2 stints shaped the career arc.
Career Dossier
The profile below keeps the headline numbers visible, then moves into tenure shape, school impact, and full season detail.
Primary school anchor
Texas A&M
Balanced profile with 2 program stops and a peak score of 77.2.
Quick Answers
Headline records use countable season rows after completed-game fallback. Partial seasons and provisional placeholders are called out separately.
51 countable games, 68.6% win rate.
2 countable seasons at Texas A&M.
2 full season rows; partial and backfilled current rows are separated.
Rows where the coach-season record covers fewer games than the team's completed season.
5 games using AP ranking at game time.
2 games using AP ranking at game time.
Lone Star Showdown games in this dataset.
3 scored postseason games in this dataset.
1 College Football Playoff-labeled games since 2014.
Matched by coach team-season against the national championship dataset.
Career records use countable coach-season rows. Zero-game placeholders are excluded from aggregates until a completed-game fallback can verify the record.
Completed-game fallback uses scored games joined by coach, team, and season; advanced ratings are left blank when the season summary has not supplied them.
Latest completed coached game in this dataset: Dec 20, 2025. At least one season record was backfilled from completed games, so current-season totals may move as more scores are loaded.
Track how the coach's season-to-season performance changed over time, where the peak landed, and where each school stint appears.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
11-2 • SRS 16.6 • SP Overall 20.7
Win %
84.6%
YoY SRS
+4.4
SP Off / Def
38.0 / 16.4
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Focus a point to inspect how it stacks up against the rest of the field.
Track career record against ranked opponents with switchable poll source and ranking timing.
Using AP Top 25 rankings at the time of each game; week-one games use the week-one ranking release when available.
Top 25
5-3
Top 10
3-2
Top 5
0-2
Each stint expands by seasons coached. Deeper color signals a stronger average SRS over that stretch.
Texas A&M
2024-2025 • 2 seasons
Avg SRS 14.4 • Win % 73.1%
Duke
2022-2023 • 2 seasons
Avg SRS 8.4 • Win % 64.0%
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Mike Elko sets the reference point in overall strength.
Mike Elko sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Mike Elko
Elite
Elite
Normalized against the full tracked coach pool.
See how each stint compared with what that program usually looked like outside that same span.
2024-2025 • 19-7
Compared with this school's baseline outside that stint over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
9.5 during vs 6.7 baseline
+2.8
Avg SRS
Higher is better
14.4 during vs 10.7 baseline
+3.7
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
18.9 during vs 15.4 baseline
+3.5
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
0.0% during vs 20.0% baseline
-20.0%
2022-2023 • 16-9
Compared with this school's baseline outside that stint over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
9.0 during vs 5.0 baseline
+4.0
Avg SRS
Higher is better
7.0 during vs -0.8 baseline
+7.8
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
5.0 during vs -1.1 baseline
+6.0
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
0.0% during vs 0.0% baseline
+0.0%
High Points
Best Season
Texas A&M 2025
11-2 • SRS 16.6
Biggest Improvement
Texas A&M 2025
11-2 • 4.4 SRS
Best Offensive Season
Texas A&M 2025
11-2 • SP Off 38.0
Best Defensive Season
Texas A&M 2025
11-2 • SP Def 16.4
Setbacks
Lowest SRS Season
Duke 2022
9-4 • SRS 7.0
Biggest Drop
Texas A&M 2024
8-5 • 2.4 SRS
Full transparency into every season in the coaching record. Positive YoY values indicate improvement from the prior season.
| Texas A&M | 2025 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 84.6% | — | — | 16.6 | 20.7 | 38.0 | 16.4 | +4.4 | +23.1% | Completed-game fallback |
| Texas A&M | 2024 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 61.5% | #20 | — | 12.2 | 17.0 | 34.0 | 18.6 | +2.4 | +3.2% | Season summary |
| Duke | 2023 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 58.3% | — | — | 9.8 | 9.4 | 27.3 | 19.5 | +2.8 | -10.9% | Partial season |
| Duke | 2022 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 69.2% | — | — | 7.0 | 5.0 | 29.4 | 24.7 | — | — | Season summary |
Popular comparisons are fan-facing matchups. Statistical comps are matched by style, strength band, volatility band, peak range, and career length.
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 1.2
Avg SRS 10.2 • Peak SRS 13.1 • 4 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 3.5
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.7
Avg SRS 12.1 • Peak SRS 15.6 • 2 seasons
Best finish #5 • Volatility 3.5
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.8
Avg SRS 12.3 • Peak SRS 19.1 • 4 seasons
Best finish #15 • Volatility 4.4
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 1.9
Avg SRS 13.3 • Peak SRS 17.4 • 3 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 3.5
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.0
Avg SRS 11.4 • Peak SRS 16.4 • 2 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 5.0
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 1.9
Avg SRS 9.5 • Peak SRS 14.3 • 3 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 3.4
Open profile →